Thursday, October 17, 2013

My Personal Declaration Of Independence

On file at the Secretary of State's office in Baton Rouge recorded as an Apostille(internationally authenticated and recorded, legal document)is my personal declaration of independence. Why not stand under the Declaration of Independence? Because that only applied to the founding fathers, as I (and you) did not sign it!

Same for the constitution, you did not sign it, therefore you can not stand under it, unless you claim your rights, THEN you can claim the constitution as a precedent of your God-given, constitutionally protected, common law rights.

Below is my personal declaration of independence








Notice of Understanding, Intent, Claim of Right, and Notice of Permanent Estoppel by Acquiescence

Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent.

Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action.

I am serving herewith, My Notice of Understanding, Intent, my Claim of Right, as well as Notice of Estoppel through Acquiescence. You will find the enclosed intact and complete.

I, Marcus Loring: of the Houssaye family , a flesh and blood living soul do hereby make oath ~ Matt.5:33 under penalty of perjury, and state the following is my truth and my law. ~ John 8:32

I am a Private Global Trust of Yahova Eloheim.  ~ 15 Stat. Ch. 249 pg. 223

I am an American Sovereign and Louisiana native. 

I am a non-citizen National as defined by Title 8, Section 1101(21) (a) et Seq.

I am also defined in Title 26 as a “nonresident alien”.

I am a Living Person and NOT a corporation, trust, transmitting utility,  missing person, or marine vessel of any kind as defined by 15USCA, section 44.

MARCUS LORING DELAHOUSSAYE is NOT a living man, but is an artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state or nation, composed, in some rare instances of a single person (such as the Strawman/Debtor/Trust/Corporation).  “The corporation is distinct from the living man or individuals who comprise it.”  Such entity subsists as a body politic under a special denomination, which is regarded in law as having a personality and distinct from that of its several members.  See Dartmouth College v. Woodward, (4 Wheat), 518 636, 657, 4 L.Ed. 629;  U.S. v. Trinidad Coal Co., 137 U.S. 160, 11 S.Ct. 57, 34 L.Ed. 640;  Andrews Bros. Co. v. Youngstown Coke Co., 86 F.585, 30 C.C.A. 293;  Porter v. Railroad Co., 76 Ill.573;  Nebraska Wheat Grower’s Ass’n v. Smith, 115 Neb. 177, 212 N.W. 39, 44;  State v. Thistle Down Jockey Club, 114 Ohio St. 582, 151 N.E. 709, 711;  Congdon v. Congdon, 160 Minn. 343, 200 N.W. 76, 87;  Forest City Mfg. Co. v. International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, Local No. 104, 233 Mo. App 935, 111 S.W. 2d. 934;  in re Crown Heights Hospital, 183 Misc. 563, 49 N.Y.S. 2d. 658, 660;  Froelich and Kuttner, of Manila, P.I., v. Sutherland, 57 App. D.C. 294, 22 F2d 870, 872.  And also “in rare instances where it lists a single person (such as the Strawman/Debtor) this would be considered a corporation sole, which consists of only that one person only in some particular station, who are incorporated by law in order to give them some legal capacities and advantages, particularly that of "in perpetuity", which in their natural persons they could not have.”  (or in the present situation, to give them some legal capacity or advantage of dealings in the government commercial activities which in their natural persons they could not have). See Step.Comm. 168, 169;  First Parish v. Dunning, 7 Mass. 447;  Reid v. Barry, 93 Fla. 849, 112 So. 846, 859.                 

                                                                                      Page 1.
 
 
 
The court cases also state that a corporation may exist as Domestic and or Foreign, with reference to the laws and the courts of any given state, a “domestic” corporation is one created by, or organized under, the laws of that state; a “foreign” corporation is one created by or under the laws of another state, government, or country.  (As in the present situation of a U.S. corporation in Puerto Rico, see (BMF) Business Master File).  In re Grand Lodge, 110 Pa. 613, 1 A. 582;  Fowler v. Chillingworth, 94 Fla. 1, 113 So. 667, 669;  in re Ewles’ Estate, 105 Utah 507, 143 P.2d 903, 905.  They also state that, “A Corporation de facto is one existing under the color of law and in pursuance of an effort made in “good faith” to organize a corporation under the statute;  an association claiming to be a legally incorporated company, and exercising the powers and functions of a corporation, but without actual lawful authority to do so.  See Foster v. Hare, 26 Tex.. Civ. App 177, 62 S.W. 541;  Cedar Rapids Water Co. v. Cedar Rapids, 118 Iowa, 234, 91 N.W. 1081;  Tulare Irrig. Dist. v. Shepard, 185 U.S. 1, 22 S.Ct. 531, 46 L.Ed. 773;  Evans v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59, 155 N.W. 1040, 1041.
 The fictitious named MARCUS LORING DELAHOUSSAYE, a straw man, or dummy corporation created by the CORPORATE government without knowledge, consent or intent of the natural living person Marcus Loring: de la Houssaye, only exists under the color of law and claiming only to be legally incorporated for the purpose of commerce, and exercising the powers and functions of a corporation, without actual lawful government authority to do so, but strictly for the benefit of the corporate government and its commerce.  The government shows the capital letter spelling of the Debtor name when they created the “fictitious named” corporation, due to the need of a specific name required for each separate legal entity’s identification.  Therefore, when a corporation is constructed, a name is always given to it, or supposing to be actually given, will attach to it by implication, and by that name alone it must sue and be sued, and do all legal acts, though a very minute variation therein is not material, and the name is capable of being changed (by competent authority) without affecting the identity or capacity of the corporation. 
I am a foreign diplomat, engaged in a diplomatic mission,  protected by the International Organizations Immunities Act, and a visiting ambassador of a kingdom foreign to the UNITED STATES INC.,  STATE OF LOUISIANA, 16th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, LOUISIANA DEPTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES, LOUISIANA OFFICE OF MOTOR VEHICLES, and all subdivisions thereof.                      ~ 22 U.S.C. 288-288f-2     and:  ~ Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 15(2) 
 I am a subject-citizen of the Kingdom of Heaven, under its King, Yashua, the Christ.                                                                                                                  ~ Louisiana Secretary of State, Apostille #13,634, and #13,635 recorded April, 18, 2012.
I am not a “US citizen", I never was and I never want to be.                                                                                  I do not consider it a valuable or prized status, and for the record:
I am the Secured Party Creditor, not the DEBTOR or the surety of, and I was defrauded of my proper identity, heritage, and birthright status, and I hereby reclaim it all in full. All agreements and signatures by my hand seeming to agree otherwise are null and void ab initio, nunc pro tunc.   ~ 18 U.S.C. 878
The “Common Law” system upon which our nation was founded has been replaced                                  and or changed by the present “Commercial Law” system, attempting to convert us                               from being American Sovereigns "over" government, to being slave subjects "under" government.
Page 2.
 
When a person is forced to use a so-called license, permit or benefit, from the government, they may also reserve their former right (under the Common Law Guarantee of said right), not to be bound by any contract, or commercial agreement, that they did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. ~UCC 1-207:7
And I do reserve my common law rights when applying for and holding any such licenses. ~ UCC 1-308
The “Common Law” system that was guaranteed to us by the Constitution for the united States of America, and for which Americans have fought, bled, and died for has been replaced by a “Commercial Law” system, wherein we have no Constitutional rights, and only government granted privileges.
The Common Law which applies to all living souls is: We are free to do what we please, as long as we do not infringe on the life, liberty, property, or rights of another. It does not allow for any government to prosecute or fine us for victimless crimes. Statute laws have arisen for this purpose, but their power is limited by common sense and by the resolve of those of us who would stand up, claim, exercise, and defend our natural, God given, unalienable rights.
Very few people ask themselves "Which nation was congress working for when it passed this Act or that so-called law?" or, "Does this particular law apply to the Continental citizenry of the Republic of sovereign states, or does this particular law apply Only to residents of the District of Columbia and her other named enclaves, or offshore territories?"
Since I and the largely uninformed citizenry of the Republic do not commonly understand legalese and thus seldom asks these questions, it was and is, an open invitation for our political leadership to seek more corporate power and authority over me and the citizenry of the Republic through the medium of "legal processes" by failing to make a "full disclosure" in corporate contractual matters. Thus, failing to make a full disclosure constitutes "constructive fraud" and renders all such contracts, agreements and signatures seeming to agree otherwise as null and void ab initio, nunc pro tunc.  ~ USA: 27 CFR 72.11
And it is my understanding that America, and all her people enjoy the protection of common-law, and it is my understanding that all flesh and blood, living beings are created equally under one creator, and it is my understanding that we are sharing this existence on Earth together under our Creator.                      ~ Genesis 1:26‐28, ( God granted the Dominion over the earth to ALL people, equally, such that every man and woman is a steward of the earth and equal to any agent, officer, judge, Pope or king.)
And it is my understanding that we have been given a conscience to deliberate and make decisions for ourselves and it is my understanding that equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, as:     "No one is above the law". A precept of commercial law founded on both Natural and Moral law binding on everyone, and no one can escape it. Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of the elite few who speak "legalese". ~ Deut. 1:17                                                                                                                                                                                                                          .                                                                                      Page 3.
 

And it is my understanding that a statute is defined as a legislative rule of society which has been given the force of law, and it is my understanding that a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and it is my understanding that the government of America is a Representative Body and Representation can only come from consent.          ~ Louisiana Secretary of State, Apostille #13,634, and #13,635 recorded April, 18, 2012.

Whereas; I am a peaceful and responsible human being and it is my understanding that peace officers have been converted into corporate policy enforcers, yet still have an oath to protect the Constitution for the united States of America and serve the people therein. Thus law enforcement officers have a duty to distinguish between corporate statute and true law and as such must decide for their selves to follow corporate orders or obey constitutional oath.

Because the lines have been blurred between what is legal and lawful, law enforcement officers are often as unaware of common law rights as the average citizen, and are being used as the front man to do the dirty work of interfacing with the public for a scam of epic proportions to extract capital from the ignorance of an innocent, yet uninformed, and mostly law abiding people who have absolute near zero knowledge of American B.A.R. Association legalese, constitutional rights, and lawful due process of law.

It is important to understand that this is not the fault of law enforcement officers. And, I am no better than anyone else, as I was once ignorant of all this too. Being ignorant is a lack of awareness, and it is not through the fault of the people who law enforcement officers are dedicated and sworn to serve and protect, or through a fault of law enforcement officers themselves, but by those who knowingly have committed gross negligence equal to fraud, dereliction of duty, malfeasance and misfeasance of office, and perjury of oath and thus betrayed the public trust their judicial office entails and requires.                 ~ 18 U.S.C. 241

U.S.C., TITLE 18, Sec. 241:                                                                 

"If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of a right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with the intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured –

They shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results, they shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.”

Whereas; I have the power and authority to refuse to contract, have intercourse or interaction with corporate policy enforcement officers who have not observed me breach the peace, cause personal injury, property damage, fraud, or a violation of rights. ~ U.C.C. 1-308                                                                                                                                                                                 .                                                                                       Page 4. 
 
 
 
            
Whereas; Permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against Me, Myself, and I, an American Sovereign, and Freeman-of-the-Land under any statute, ordinance or act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time. ~ Deut. 19:15
My Intent and Claim of Right:
Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and effected parties, that I, Marcus Loring: of the Houssaye family, an American native and Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly, and specifically, and unequivocally, my intent to live in harmony as an American Sovereign, and peacefully, lawfully co-exist in the present de-facto corporate system, free of all corporate statutory obligations, restrictions, permissions, and freely claim, exercise, defend, and maintain in common law jurisdiction, all unalienable rights at law and trade, exchange and barter, which is my birthright. ~ UCC 1-207:7
I claim the right not to apply for licenses, permits, registrations, or to seek permission to do any activity that is already lawful. Yet, I will in the short term, for the sole purpose of maintaining peace, respect, security and harmony, apply for, and possess registrations, licenses, insurance and inspections during this temporary period of political and legal transition, and do declare my conditional acceptance of said registration and licenses is an attempt to peacefully co-exist in the present de-facto system, and does not compromise my full reservation of international common law political status, and unalienable rights as the secured party creditor.  ~ UCC 1-308
I claim the right to exercise my “common law right to travel” on land, water, or air, unhindered, unencumbered, at my discretion in my private conveyance of the day, to wit, my private, unregistered, unlicensed mechanically propelled automobile, boat, trailer, truck, motorcycle, or aircraft.
I claim the right to possess unregistered firearms and ammunition, and to use the same for target practice or for hunting for food, and further swear under oath never to open fire on another human being unless I am in fear of my life and as a last resort to protect from harm, any other human life. I also swear to come to the aid of any fireman, EMT, or peace officer should they request my back up, or assistance and even risk my life to serve them, because they would do the same for me. That is my personal oath.  ~ Exodus 20:13
Furthermore, I claim that the intentional blurring of the lines and the failure to define between that which is legal, and that which is lawful in order to extract capital from the masses by legislating freedom and then putting a price tag on it, is a crime on Man, and the failure to define between the living Natural Man and the State created Corporate Fiction is nothing short of a constructive fraud, theft, breach of trust and forced slavery, a heinous criminal activity of the most odious form.   ~ Exodus 20:15, 16
I claim that the courts in the United States of America are de-facto and are in fact in the profitable business of creating, conducting, witnessing and executing commercial contracts, and then facilitating the transactions of those security interests with unknowing, and un-consenting parties. I also claim that in order to be lawful, commercial contracts require the knowledge and consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.                                                                                                                                                                      .                                                                                      Page 5
 
I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or color of right and such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure. 
Furthermore, because all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties, I do here by refuse to contract, and deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act or Statute for as stated: I am an American Sovereign, a Freeman-on-the-Land, I am not subject to any Act.
"governments are instituted by the consent of the governed."                                                                            ~ Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776
Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by corporate policy enforcers, government principals, officers, agents or justice system participants is (1oz of gold ) ONE OUNCE OF GOLD ($1,800) per hour or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed, searched or otherwise regulated and (5oz of gold) FIVE OUNCES OF GOLD ($9,000) per hour or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and notarized consent.  ~ 18 U.S.C. 878                                                                                                                                                    
Furthermore, I state that it is my honor and duty to claim and exercise the God given unalienable rights that I was born with, and to protect them and ensure they exist for future generations.
I claim that the law of agent and principal does apply and that service upon one is equal to both.
Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose I see fit.
Responses must be under Oath attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certification of service.
Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the prosecution or presentment of charges under any statute or Act against me.
Signed: ________________________________________________    date: _____________
                      Marcus Loring: de la Houssaye                                                                                                        
 Notary Public:                                                       
 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    .                                                                             
 
 

No comments:

Post a Comment