Sovereignty is NOT a Crime!

A friend of mine is being "accused" of being sovereign,(like it is a crime?) and for no other reason but because he is my friend. Recently he commented that they are harassing him more than me, and yet it is only me who is sovereign. I advised him that he would be better off being sovereign because he would have constitutionally protected rights as a sovereign. He then realized that I am sovereign(and have all my documents on file at the Secretary of States office to prove my claim), and when I got to court, they tried to deny that I am sovereign by violating my rights. Then when they accused him of being sovereign, and he is actually an upstanding young business man in the community, and a tax paying citizen, but they violated his rights also, and all he has done is to be a friend with someone(me) whom they are trying to separate him from.

Too bad for his accusers that being sovereign is not a crime it is a birthright!

                                                                            

  


OK, the fraud started with the birth certificate, which unbeknown to us was a title to our body.(how dare they steal MY birthright: which IS to legally and lawfully own and reside in MY body) It was not only theft of our private property, it was identity theft, (how dare they convert my name into an all caps corporation(with no constitutionally protected rights) in order to deceive and extort money from me in an admiralty/ maritime /equity court which actually in law has no jurisdiction over a living human being) and because the birth certificate(a fraudulent contract) was delivered to the parents via US Mail, it was mail fraud, etc, etc etc... DO YOU SEE A CRIMINAL PATERN HERE? ...so to make a long story short: everything done to us in the name of the strawman is, was, and will be fraud. Therefore, now that we are aware of the fraud, in the future, when we accept a supeona, citatation, etc, without protesting and advising the deliveryman that we are aware of the fraud, unbeknownst to us, WE are an accessory to the fraud! Because the fraud STARTED with the birth certificate(as an adhesion contract, without full disclosure) it and every other contract in the name of the strawman is null and void!

Until we protest the fraud, forced slavery, identity theft, etc, and re-identitfy who we truly are (meaning re-contract on our terms), the de-facto contracts are legal(however unlawful) and binding.

THE MOST Important Thing To Understand About SOVEREIGNTY

The following post was composed by Rob Johnson of the Sui Juris group on facebook.

 

I have copied it unedited and posted it here for your educational benefit.

 

 

 

 

THE very MOST important thing to understand about SOVEREIGNTY, and claiming and exercising it in stead of CITIZENSHIP, is that CITIZENSHIP is a contract where the would be prospective citizen pledges an oath of allegiance in exchange for a duty of protection. That most important thing to understand is that the duty of protection is an illusion, it doesnt exist, because government has asserted no duty to protect ANYONE. The fact is and this is the fear that most people approaching sovereignty are accosted by that manipulates people into keeping their distance away from sovereignty and holding, clinging desperately TO citizenship, and so here it is.

The fact is that ALL individuals BORN here have a fundamental BIRTHRIGHT to exist here, and that ALL individuals are entitled to ALL of the protections afforded to anyone by LAW, natural freedom, individual autonomous rights, and JUSTICE above all. The fact is that ALL individuals are entitled to the protections of LAW, these protections are NOT what is exchanged in citizenship for allegiance, those protections are of LIMITED LIABILITY. So, to clarify, those who are SOVEREIGN, and refuse to contract for CITIZENSHIP, have not LOST ANY of the protections of LAW, they only lose protections of LIMITED LIABILITY. So one who is sovereign MUST accept a great deal of personal responsibility for their own actions to ensure that they cause no harm to anyone while exercising rights. It si a BIG responsibility but not all that difficult to fulfill. Simply using common sense in most cases is sufficient. The problem is that government wants people to believe that only CITIZENS are afforded the protections of law with respect to their rights, but this is completely false, utter fabrication, and bald faced LIES. The fact is that you are not OBLIGATED to BECOME a CITIZEN to secure the protections of LAW, you were BORN with them. The only protection you secure via citizenship are FINANCIAL in nature, of LIMITED LIABILITY. LIABILITY and RESPONSIBILITY are very different things. RESPONSIBILITY is a common law attribute, LIABILITY is an attribute of maritime admiralty equity.

This is important because the State has recently gotten it into its head that it can strip all rights from an individual by stripping their citizenship, and to do so require NO EVIDENCE per NDAA, and a mere ACCUSATION of "terrorism" can now be used like a modern day witch hunt to crucify anyone who disagrees with anythign the State does. It is true that the State can strip the CITIZENSHIP of ANY citizen and as such they can remove ALL of the PRIVILEGES accompanying citizenship, privileges which identically mimic RIGHTS. The fact of the matter however is that NO entity can strip the SOVEREIGNTY of another. It is as true today as it was over 235 years ago that ONLY a JURY can remove RIGHTS from an individual. So as much as NDAA wants to purport, it is NOT TRUE, government CANNOT remove the rights of an individual nor the protections of due process of law, all they can do is manipulate people into believing and agreeing in contract with a court that they can do so. In reality it is the individual that strips themselves of their rights, not the state doing it, the State is just the puppeteer pulling at the strings of the most primal survival mechanisms.

So the truth is the exact opposite once again as what most people are programmed to believe. And that single most important fact in summation, is that claiming SOVEREIGNTY and rejecting CITIZENSHIP, is that one does not WAIVE, or LOSE, the most fundamental protections of their rights, which literally ARE the law, the very highest law, by claiming sovereignty and rejecting citizenship. The truth is that ACCEPTING citizenship is where you waive all RIGHTS and protections of LAW, and VOLUNTARILY so in CONTRACT, exchanging them for mere PRIVILEGED PROTECTIONS OF LIMITED LIABILITY, NOT the other way around like they want you to believe. Absent a jury only your consent can remove your rights and exchange them for these privileges which CAN be stripped or revoked at any time by the grantor. ALL privileges can be revoked at any time by the grantor where as RIGHTS are absolute, and untouchable.

For example. I own a home with a front lawn. My neighbor and I are friends. I permit my neighbor to cut across my lawn extending a privilege, so he does not have to walk all the way around. The fact that I have extended a privilege does not OBLIGATE ME the GRANTOR to continue to extend that privilege. ANY day I choose I can revoke the privilege and refuse to allow my neighbor the privilege of crossing my property. I can do this for ANY reason, or NO reason. On the other hand, there is NOTHING I can do to stop my neighbor from doing what they want on THEIR property. They have a right to exist on THEIR property, and a PRIVILEGE to exist temporarily upon MY property per the privilege extended. This is a FORM of contract, it is an agreement, which is all ANY contract is. A contract is simply an agreement with terms clearly established in writing.

So again after detailing completely as I have done, in summary, an individual claiming sovereignty is actually in a BETTER position to avoid having their rights violated, and actually has recourse if they are, where as a citizen can have their privileges removed at any time. Violating someone's privileges is not an actionable offense, there is no recourse for citizens against their grantors, just as my neighbor has no recourse to complain if I revoke his privilege to cut across my lawn. I hope this puts things into perspective well. THIS is the nature of sovereignty, and exercising these rights as well as defending them is the very heart and essence of what Sui Juris Law is all about.

 

 

 

If you are interested in purchasing Rob's book, you may do so at this link:

 

www.suijurislaw.co

America Has Become An Occupied Territory

The post below was original written by Rob Johnson of the Sui Juris group on Facebook, and re-edited by yours truly, Marcus de la Houssaye, Ambassador of the Republic of Louisiana.

Our government is no longer OUR government.

                                                                               

 

It is an occupying force, and more accurately identified as a corporate FARCE masquerading as government, pretending to be OF and FOR the people, when in truth it is only OF and FOR the interests of FOREIGN owned corporate entities.

                                                                             

 These include the banking entities, news, entertainment, and advertising entities, real estate entities, the industrial military complex, the industrial prison complex, and then as a group, the big three: chemical, agricultural and pharmaceutical entities.

                                      
And to be more specific, all are conglomerated within the Federal Reserve Bank under the umbrella pyramid compartmentalization which is operated by the Vatican, and the Crown of England at its very highest levels. And THIS truth is WHY American freedoms are disappearing, and  WHY Americans themselves have become so ignorant of their legal  rights and the law, as well as the proper role of law enforcement.


                                                                               

                                                                              

 We have been legally(through contracts), mentally(through education and media), and physically conquered, and been under the spell of a subtle, and insidious occupation of fear and the illusion of government provided security for a very long time, of over 150 years.

Only NOW, the truth is rearing its ugly head and becoming brazen enough to make itself public.


                                                                           

Only now, that the people have become so comfortable in the illusion, and well acclimated to their corporate servitude and to such a degree that they CLING to this "government provided security" which in truth is not at all security, but forced slavery, as the only real security is the freedom we are born with.

 

 Only now can we begin to see not security, but the illusion of and instead what has been portrayed as security is really a familiarity, or a form of the Stockholm syndrome, that en mass has crippled the spirit of American freedom and defiance to the present tyranny, and as a result, the state of American defense has declined, because we the people are the REAL and original Homeland Security.

                                                                                

  

 And on that note, I want to see the police OR military force that will confront and disarm America's redneck deer and duck hunters! Come on people, we have lots of guns, ammo, know how to kill and are not afraid to fight, yet if we were defending ALL of our rights all along, we would not be talking about 2nd Amendment rights now.


                                                                           

Our people are not even aware that there IS an occupying force that is already controlling this country. That force is not accountable to anyone in the public domain. They are a private entity using the members of the BAR association, the kangaroo courts, AND  the police associations to control and extort money and real estate from ignorant and mostly innocent Americans.

                                                                         

 The average individual on the street has no idea that they are not truly free, because their perspective upon freedom has been so distorted by well financed agendas advanced by entities that profess to be institutions of education, news, advertising, and entertainment which are wrapped in such officialdom that it is DESIGNED by a grand architect of deception to be accepted as real.

                                                                              

 

Most people only have a microcosmic sense of freedom, the freedom to choose what to eat for breakfast, where to live and enslave themselves, what form of work to enslave themselves in, but none the less all for the benefit of other corporate(pretending to be a government) entities. Even most self employed small business Americans are enslaved to the  corporate government believing that they owe some duty to state for the RIGHT to earn a living.

                                                                                    

God given, and constitutionally protected common law rights have no FINANCIAL duty attached. The only duty accompanying common law rights is the RESPONSIBILITY to not harm others through the exercise of those rights. ANY right CAN be violated and abused, and certain activities have been restricted, regulated and controlled, not because they are dangerous inherently, but because it is a good excuse to initiate such a control in the interest of extorting money from ignorant and mostly innocent people, and those initiating it have opportunities to present corporate profit returns to their foreign allegiances and care nothing for individual American freedoms or the loss there of.


                                                                          

Again I say it, this country is an OCCUPIED TERRITORY.

 And we are as damned as the Germans were when Hitler took over by 98% majority election.  Are you aware  that Nazi Germany was a democracy? And are you aware that the government that the founding fathers gave us was and IS a Republic of Sovereign united States?

                                                                       

The greatest evils are not overt, they are subtle, and none are more hopelessly enslaved than those who have been manipulated, programed and falsely led to believe that they are free. So why cause slaves to think they are free? Well, slaves who mistakenly believe they are free, are easier to control AND they are as a bonus: MORE PRODUCTIVE for their masters!

                                                                           

  

And we ALL feel this slavery around us, never testing it never touching the borders trying to deny its existence. Otherwise people would not fear to claim, exercise and defend lawful rights and freely engage in god given, constitutional protected, lawful activities without a permit from the State.


                                                                     

 There has been so much destruction, bloodshed and death caused in the name of a god than any combination of forces throughout history. Yet there is no license attached to worship, but there IS a license advanced as an obligation with respect to travel. WHY?  Because being on the road allows them to place debt obligations upon our back for meaningless violations, which are meaningless because there is no accident, property damage, or personal injury.

 Not everyone wishes to worship, but EVERYONE must travel in todays society because todays societies and cities have been deliberately engineered in such a way that one is REQUIRED to travel to prosper and even to survive. Subtle manipulation of personal locomotion is another means of limiting and controlling our freedoms. It is no longer like it used to be where everything one needs to survive exists in the village or  nearby surrounding countryside. Again we are an occupied State, and the most evil aspect of it is that no one knows that our homeland has been conquered and is occupied by evil men and women with less than honorable intentions to enslave us through fraud, debt and the fear of poverty.

What Ever Happened to the Constitution? | Andrew Napolitano

"WHAT HAPPENED TO THE CONSTITUTION"

My Personal Declaration Of Independence

On file at the Secretary of State's office in Baton Rouge recorded as an Apostille(internationally authenticated and recorded, legal document)is my personal declaration of independence. Why not stand under the Declaration of Independence? Because that only applied to the founding fathers, as I (and you) did not sign it!

Same for the constitution, you did not sign it, therefore you can not stand under it, unless you claim your rights, THEN you can claim the constitution as a precedent of your God-given, constitutionally protected, common law rights.

Below is my personal declaration of independence

Notice of Understanding, Intent, Claim of Right, and Notice of Permanent Estoppel by Acquiescence

Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent.

Affected parties wishing to dispute the claims made herein or make their own counterclaims must respond appropriately within TEN (10) days of service of notice of this action.

I am serving herewith, My Notice of Understanding, Intent, my Claim of Right, as well as Notice of Estoppel through Acquiescence. You will find the enclosed intact and complete.

I, Marcus Loring: of the Houssaye family , a flesh and blood living soul do hereby make oath ~ Matt.5:33 under penalty of perjury, and state the following is my truth and my law. ~ John 8:32

I am a Private Global Trust of Yahova Eloheim.  ~ 15 Stat. Ch. 249 pg. 223

I am an American Sovereign and Louisiana native. 

I am a non-citizen National as defined by Title 8, Section 1101(21) (a) et Seq.

I am also defined in Title 26 as a “nonresident alien”.

I am a Living Person and NOT a corporation, trust, transmitting utility,  missing person, or marine vessel of any kind as defined by 15USCA, section 44.

MARCUS LORING DELAHOUSSAYE is NOT a living man, but is an artificial person or legal entity created by or under the authority of the laws of a state or nation, composed, in some rare instances of a single person (such as the Strawman/Debtor/Trust/Corporation).  “The corporation is distinct from the living man or individuals who comprise it.”  Such entity subsists as a body politic under a special denomination, which is regarded in law as having a personality and distinct from that of its several members.  See Dartmouth College v. Woodward, (4 Wheat), 518 636, 657, 4 L.Ed. 629;  U.S. v. Trinidad Coal Co., 137 U.S. 160, 11 S.Ct. 57, 34 L.Ed. 640;  Andrews Bros. Co. v. Youngstown Coke Co., 86 F.585, 30 C.C.A. 293;  Porter v. Railroad Co., 76 Ill.573;  Nebraska Wheat Grower’s Ass’n v. Smith, 115 Neb. 177, 212 N.W. 39, 44;  State v. Thistle Down Jockey Club, 114 Ohio St. 582, 151 N.E. 709, 711;  Congdon v. Congdon, 160 Minn. 343, 200 N.W. 76, 87;  Forest City Mfg. Co. v. International Ladies’ Garment Workers’ Union, Local No. 104, 233 Mo. App 935, 111 S.W. 2d. 934;  in re Crown Heights Hospital, 183 Misc. 563, 49 N.Y.S. 2d. 658, 660;  Froelich and Kuttner, of Manila, P.I., v. Sutherland, 57 App. D.C. 294, 22 F2d 870, 872.  And also “in rare instances where it lists a single person (such as the Strawman/Debtor) this would be considered a corporation sole, which consists of only that one person only in some particular station, who are incorporated by law in order to give them some legal capacities and advantages, particularly that of "in perpetuity", which in their natural persons they could not have.”  (or in the present situation, to give them some legal capacity or advantage of dealings in the government commercial activities which in their natural persons they could not have). See Step.Comm. 168, 169;  First Parish v. Dunning, 7 Mass. 447;  Reid v. Barry, 93 Fla. 849, 112 So. 846, 859.                 

                                                                                      Page 1.

 

 

 

The court cases also state that a corporation may exist as Domestic and or Foreign, with reference to the laws and the courts of any given state, a “domestic” corporation is one created by, or organized under, the laws of that state; a “foreign” corporation is one created by or under the laws of another state, government, or country.  (As in the present situation of a U.S. corporation in Puerto Rico, see (BMF) Business Master File).  In re Grand Lodge, 110 Pa. 613, 1 A. 582;  Fowler v. Chillingworth, 94 Fla. 1, 113 So. 667, 669;  in re Ewles’ Estate, 105 Utah 507, 143 P.2d 903, 905.  They also state that, “A Corporation de facto is one existing under the color of law and in pursuance of an effort made in “good faith” to organize a corporation under the statute;  an association claiming to be a legally incorporated company, and exercising the powers and functions of a corporation, but without actual lawful authority to do so.  See Foster v. Hare, 26 Tex.. Civ. App 177, 62 S.W. 541;  Cedar Rapids Water Co. v. Cedar Rapids, 118 Iowa, 234, 91 N.W. 1081;  Tulare Irrig. Dist. v. Shepard, 185 U.S. 1, 22 S.Ct. 531, 46 L.Ed. 773;  Evans v. Anderson, 132 Minn. 59, 155 N.W. 1040, 1041.

 The fictitious named MARCUS LORING DELAHOUSSAYE, a straw man, or dummy corporation created by the CORPORATE government without knowledge, consent or intent of the natural living person Marcus Loring: de la Houssaye, only exists under the color of law and claiming only to be legally incorporated for the purpose of commerce, and exercising the powers and functions of a corporation, without actual lawful government authority to do so, but strictly for the benefit of the corporate government and its commerce.  The government shows the capital letter spelling of the Debtor name when they created the “fictitious named” corporation, due to the need of a specific name required for each separate legal entity’s identification.  Therefore, when a corporation is constructed, a name is always given to it, or supposing to be actually given, will attach to it by implication, and by that name alone it must sue and be sued, and do all legal acts, though a very minute variation therein is not material, and the name is capable of being changed (by competent authority) without affecting the identity or capacity of the corporation. 

I am a foreign diplomat, engaged in a diplomatic mission,  protected by the International Organizations Immunities Act, and a visiting ambassador of a kingdom foreign to the UNITED STATES INC.,  STATE OF LOUISIANA, 16th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, LOUISIANA DEPTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES, LOUISIANA OFFICE OF MOTOR VEHICLES, and all subdivisions thereof.                      ~ 22 U.S.C. 288-288f-2     and:  ~ Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 15(2) 

 I am a subject-citizen of the Kingdom of Heaven, under its King, Yashua, the Christ.                                                                                                                  ~ Louisiana Secretary of State, Apostille #13,634, and #13,635 recorded April, 18, 2012.

I am not a “US citizen", I never was and I never want to be.                                                                                  I do not consider it a valuable or prized status, and for the record:

I am the Secured Party Creditor, not the DEBTOR or the surety of, and I was defrauded of my proper identity, heritage, and birthright status, and I hereby reclaim it all in full. All agreements and signatures by my hand seeming to agree otherwise are null and void ab initio, nunc pro tunc.   ~ 18 U.S.C. 878

The “Common Law” system upon which our nation was founded has been replaced                                  and or changed by the present “Commercial Law” system, attempting to convert us                               from being American Sovereigns "over" government, to being slave subjects "under" government.

Page 2.

 

When a person is forced to use a so-called license, permit or benefit, from the government, they may also reserve their former right (under the Common Law Guarantee of said right), not to be bound by any contract, or commercial agreement, that they did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. ~UCC 1-207:7

And I do reserve my common law rights when applying for and holding any such licenses. ~ UCC 1-308

The “Common Law” system that was guaranteed to us by the Constitution for the united States of America, and for which Americans have fought, bled, and died for has been replaced by a “Commercial Law” system, wherein we have no Constitutional rights, and only government granted privileges.

The Common Law which applies to all living souls is: We are free to do what we please, as long as we do not infringe on the life, liberty, property, or rights of another. It does not allow for any government to prosecute or fine us for victimless crimes. Statute laws have arisen for this purpose, but their power is limited by common sense and by the resolve of those of us who would stand up, claim, exercise, and defend our natural, God given, unalienable rights.

Very few people ask themselves "Which nation was congress working for when it passed this Act or that so-called law?" or, "Does this particular law apply to the Continental citizenry of the Republic of sovereign states, or does this particular law apply Only to residents of the District of Columbia and her other named enclaves, or offshore territories?"

Since I and the largely uninformed citizenry of the Republic do not commonly understand legalese and thus seldom asks these questions, it was and is, an open invitation for our political leadership to seek more corporate power and authority over me and the citizenry of the Republic through the medium of "legal processes" by failing to make a "full disclosure" in corporate contractual matters. Thus, failing to make a full disclosure constitutes "constructive fraud" and renders all such contracts, agreements and signatures seeming to agree otherwise as null and void ab initio, nunc pro tunc.  ~ USA: 27 CFR 72.11

And it is my understanding that America, and all her people enjoy the protection of common-law, and it is my understanding that all flesh and blood, living beings are created equally under one creator, and it is my understanding that we are sharing this existence on Earth together under our Creator.                      ~ Genesis 1:26‐28, ( God granted the Dominion over the earth to ALL people, equally, such that every man and woman is a steward of the earth and equal to any agent, officer, judge, Pope or king.)

And it is my understanding that we have been given a conscience to deliberate and make decisions for ourselves and it is my understanding that equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, as:     "No one is above the law". A precept of commercial law founded on both Natural and Moral law binding on everyone, and no one can escape it. Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of the elite few who speak "legalese". ~ Deut. 1:17                                                                                                                                                                                                                          .                                                                                      Page 3.

 

And it is my understanding that a statute is defined as a legislative rule of society which has been given the force of law, and it is my understanding that a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and it is my understanding that the government of America is a Representative Body and Representation can only come from consent.          ~ Louisiana Secretary of State, Apostille #13,634, and #13,635 recorded April, 18, 2012.

Whereas; I am a peaceful and responsible human being and it is my understanding that peace officers have been converted into corporate policy enforcers, yet still have an oath to protect the Constitution for the united States of America and serve the people therein. Thus law enforcement officers have a duty to distinguish between corporate statute and true law and as such must decide for their selves to follow corporate orders or obey constitutional oath.

Because the lines have been blurred between what is legal and lawful, law enforcement officers are often as unaware of common law rights as the average citizen, and are being used as the front man to do the dirty work of interfacing with the public for a scam of epic proportions to extract capital from the ignorance of an innocent, yet uninformed, and mostly law abiding people who have absolute near zero knowledge of American B.A.R. Association legalese, constitutional rights, and lawful due process of law.

It is important to understand that this is not the fault of law enforcement officers. And, I am no better than anyone else, as I was once ignorant of all this too. Being ignorant is a lack of awareness, and it is not through the fault of the people who law enforcement officers are dedicated and sworn to serve and protect, or through a fault of law enforcement officers themselves, but by those who knowingly have committed gross negligence equal to fraud, dereliction of duty, malfeasance and misfeasance of office, and perjury of oath and thus betrayed the public trust their judicial office entails and requires.                 ~ 18 U.S.C. 241

U.S.C., TITLE 18, Sec. 241:                                                                 

"If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any citizen in the free exercise or enjoyment of a right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or the laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with the intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured –

They shall be fined not more than $10,000 or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results, they shall be subject to imprisonment for any term of years or for life.”

Whereas; I have the power and authority to refuse to contract, have intercourse or interaction with corporate policy enforcement officers who have not observed me breach the peace, cause personal injury, property damage, fraud, or a violation of rights. ~ U.C.C. 1-308                                                                                                                                                                                 .                                                                                       Page 4. 

 

 

 

            

Whereas; Permanent estoppel by acquiescence barring any peace officer or prosecutor from bringing charges against Me, Myself, and I, an American Sovereign, and Freeman-of-the-Land under any statute, ordinance or act is created if this claim is not responded to in the stated fashion and time. ~ Deut. 19:15

My Intent and Claim of Right:

Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and effected parties, that I, Marcus Loring: of the Houssaye family, an American native and Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly, and specifically, and unequivocally, my intent to live in harmony as an American Sovereign, and peacefully, lawfully co-exist in the present de-facto corporate system, free of all corporate statutory obligations, restrictions, permissions, and freely claim, exercise, defend, and maintain in common law jurisdiction, all unalienable rights at law and trade, exchange and barter, which is my birthright. ~ UCC 1-207:7

I claim the right not to apply for licenses, permits, registrations, or to seek permission to do any activity that is already lawful. Yet, I will in the short term, for the sole purpose of maintaining peace, respect, security and harmony, apply for, and possess registrations, licenses, insurance and inspections during this temporary period of political and legal transition, and do declare my conditional acceptance of said registration and licenses is an attempt to peacefully co-exist in the present de-facto system, and does not compromise my full reservation of international common law political status, and unalienable rights as the secured party creditor.  ~ UCC 1-308

I claim the right to exercise my “common law right to travel” on land, water, or air, unhindered, unencumbered, at my discretion in my private conveyance of the day, to wit, my private, unregistered, unlicensed mechanically propelled automobile, boat, trailer, truck, motorcycle, or aircraft.

I claim the right to possess unregistered firearms and ammunition, and to use the same for target practice or for hunting for food, and further swear under oath never to open fire on another human being unless I am in fear of my life and as a last resort to protect from harm, any other human life. I also swear to come to the aid of any fireman, EMT, or peace officer should they request my back up, or assistance and even risk my life to serve them, because they would do the same for me. That is my personal oath.  ~ Exodus 20:13

Furthermore, I claim that the intentional blurring of the lines and the failure to define between that which is legal, and that which is lawful in order to extract capital from the masses by legislating freedom and then putting a price tag on it, is a crime on Man, and the failure to define between the living Natural Man and the State created Corporate Fiction is nothing short of a constructive fraud, theft, breach of trust and forced slavery, a heinous criminal activity of the most odious form.   ~ Exodus 20:15, 16

I claim that the courts in the United States of America are de-facto and are in fact in the profitable business of creating, conducting, witnessing and executing commercial contracts, and then facilitating the transactions of those security interests with unknowing, and un-consenting parties. I also claim that in order to be lawful, commercial contracts require the knowledge and consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.                                                                                                                                                                      .                                                                                      Page 5

 

I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or color of right and such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure. 

Furthermore, because all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties, I do here by refuse to contract, and deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act or Statute for as stated: I am an American Sovereign, a Freeman-on-the-Land, I am not subject to any Act.

"governments are instituted by the consent of the governed."                                                                            ~ Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776

Furthermore, I claim my FEE SCHEDULE for any transgressions by corporate policy enforcers, government principals, officers, agents or justice system participants is (1oz of gold ) ONE OUNCE OF GOLD ($1,800) per hour or portion thereof if being questioned, interrogated or in any way detained, harassed, searched or otherwise regulated and (5oz of gold) FIVE OUNCES OF GOLD ($9,000) per hour or portion thereof if I am handcuffed, transported, incarcerated or subjected to any adjudication process without my express written and notarized consent.  ~ 18 U.S.C. 878                                                                                                                                                    

Furthermore, I state that it is my honor and duty to claim and exercise the God given unalienable rights that I was born with, and to protect them and ensure they exist for future generations.

I claim that the law of agent and principal does apply and that service upon one is equal to both.

Furthermore, I claim the right to deal with any counterclaims or disputes publicly and in an open forum using discussion and negotiation and to capture on video tape said discussion and negotiation for whatever lawful purpose I see fit.

Responses must be under Oath attestation, upon full commercial liability and penalty of perjury and registered in the Notary Office herein provided no later than ten days from the date of original service as attested to by way of certification of service.

Failure to register a dispute against the claims made herein will result in an automatic default judgment and permanent and irrevocable estoppel by acquiescence barring the prosecution or presentment of charges under any statute or Act against me.

Signed: ________________________________________________    date: _____________

                      Marcus Loring: de la Houssaye                                                                                                        

 Notary Public:                                                       

 

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    .                                                                             

 

 

What Is A Sovereign American?

In the title of this post, the word sovereign is being used as an adjective, and it can also be used as a noun as you will see below

I am an American Sovereign, not because I am un-American OR unpatriotic, but just the opposite!

The federal government has instructed the federal, state and local police agencies that everyone who purports to be a SOVEREIGN should be TREATED as a TERRORIST! (and it is being reported this week that I am on a local cop killer watch list!)    Funny thing is: to my knowledge, I have never killed anyone, threatened anyone, and according to my documents on file at the Secretary of State's office. I have a swown oath to come to the assistance of the police if called upon!

Below is a "quote " from my personal declaration of independence regarding my relationship with law enforcement.

I claim the right to possess unregistered firearms and ammunition, and to use the same for target practice or for hunting for food, and further swear under oath never to open fire on another human being unless I am in fear of my life and as a last resort to protect from harm, any other human life. I also swear to come to the aid of any fireman, EMT, or peace officer should they request my back up, or assistance and even risk my life to serve them, because they would do the same for me. That is my personal oath. ~ Exodus 20:13

The American news media has also brainwashing the American public into believing that being a SOVEREIGN is unlawful, anti-American and unpatriotic!

 Perhaps this is: “The POT calling the KETTLE black?”

WHAT IS SOVEREIGNTY?

It is the inherent right and prerogative of a civilized people to rule itself, and to dictate all of the forms and conditions of the institutions it sets up to carry out this rule.

 Ironically, the U.S. SUPREME COURT agrees with the people who claim to be SOVEREIGNS of the American Republic regarding our immunity to corporate statutes, rules, restriction, regulation, ordinances, acts of congress, etc!

Bond vs. UNITED STATES, 529 US 334 – 2000,

The Supreme Court held that the American People are in fact Sovereign and not the States or the Federal Government. The court went on to define that local, state and federal law enforcement officers were committing unlawful actions against the Sovereigns by the enforcement of the corporate policies(because statutes are not laws) and are personally liable for their actions.

Bond v. United States, 529 US 334 – 2000 – Supreme Court –
 Cited by 761 litigants in other cases.

 Bond v. US, 131 S. Ct. 2355 – 2011 – Supreme Court – Cited by 306 “ “

 Bond v. US, 1 F. 3d 631 – 1993 – Court of Appeals, 7th – Cited by 66 “ “



What are the implications of this 2000, U. S. Supreme Court ruling?

1] The delegates to the first Federal Convention prohibited the use of corporations by all governments representing the American Republic. Therefore, all of these corporate governments and their corporate laws are a usurpation of the organic Constitution of the United States of America. All State Governments are now sub-corporations of the Federal Government, making all Courts and all law enforcement personnel, corporate federal agencies or employees. [See: James Madison Journal of the Federal Convention, Vol. 2, P. 722] and [Pull up your State Code on your PC and search the Code for the words “District of Columbia” and “Federal Government.” You will receive about 1000 references linking your state to the federal government.]
  2] The state and federal government is a corporation and therefore the Congress, State Legislatures, City Councils, Municipalities and all State and Federal Courts are corporate entities(and thus are fraudulently) posing as Constitutional branches of government.

3] Corporations are privately owned businesses, meaning that the Corporate United States belongs to one or more private individuals, which is always governed by a Board of Directors. The Corporate United States is privately owned by a group of European Royal and Elite individuals tied to the Federal Reserve System and the letters of incorporation are recorded in the Vatican. The President of the United States is actually the CEO of the United States and the Congress and all others are corporate employees. Everything they do is in the interest of the corporate owners! I can’t access those documents because of National Security.

4] In order to promulgate and enforce Criminal Laws to govern the SOVEREIGN public, government must be SOVEREIGN too, which is an accepted RULE of LAW derived from the, Ancient Law of Kings. Corporations are not and can never be SOVEREIGN. They are not real, they are a fiction and only exist on paper.  5] Therefore, all laws created by these government corporations are private corporate regulations called public law, statutes, codes and ordinances to conceal their true nature. Do the Judge and your lawyer know about this? You bet they do!

6] Since these government bodies are not SOVEREIGN, they cannot promulgate or enforce CRIMINAL LAWS; they can only create and enforce CIVIL LAWS, which are duty bound to comply with the LAW of CONTRACTS. The Law of Contracts requires signed written agreements and complete transparency! Did you ever agree to be arrested and tried under any of their corporate statutes? For that matter, did you ever agree to contract with them by agreeing to be sued for violating their corporate regulations?

[Citations are offers to contract, but they lack transparency because you were never told what might happen to you if you agree to contract, and that you had a right to refuse the accommodation!]

7] Do any of Americas Courts  ever have Jurisdiction over a SOVEREIGN? Yes … but only by your consent to be judged by the Court. Can they compel [Summon or Subpoena] you to appear or participate in their corporate policy enforcement process? No … they can’t compel you and Yes … they can ask, but you can reject the accommodation in writing and nothing can be done about it because you have refused to give the court jurisdiction over you!
 8] Enforcement of these corporate statutes by local, state and federal law enforcement officers are unlawful actions being committed against the SOVEREIGN public and these officers can be held personally liable for their actions. [Bond v. U.S., 529 US 334-2000]

9] There being no Constitutional Criminal Laws or Transparency in the American Justice System, everyone arrested, convicted and sentenced to prison under these CIVIL LAWS are in prison by CONSENT and therein, all American Jails are actually DEBTORS PRISONS!

10] Most of the County and State Prisons and all of the Federal Prisons are privately owned corporate businesses for profit, which kick back to the sentencing Judges. The Bureau of Prisons Privatization Management Branch provides general oversight, for these institutions. So if you are convicted in these Courts, you can expect to serve some jail time! Now you know why America has such high prison populations!

11] Can the State Government and Courts take Custody of your children? Only with your consent, otherwise their agents and officers can be held personally liable for their kidnapping actions! Orphans are a different matter and can become wards of the Court until emancipated.

Corporate governments are a usurpation of the organic American Constitution and this corporatist onslaught in America has since its creation, been an ANTI-SOVEREIGN and TERRORIST REGIME and are in fact the real TERRORISTS and TRAITORS to the American Republic.

Bottom line: I am not protesting the police, as much as I am protesting the judiciary who are using the police as the front man to do the dirty work of extorting money from very ignorant and mostly innocent Americans.


Below is a copy of a few paragraphs from my personal Declaration of Independence where I legally separated my self from the corporation called UNITED STATES, INC......   

   

 The fictitious named MARCUS LORING DELAHOUSSAYE, a straw man, or dummy corporation created by the CORPORATE government without knowledge, consent or intent of the natural living person Marcus Loring: de la Houssaye, only exists under the color of law and claiming only to be legally incorporated for the purpose of commerce, and exercising the powers and functions of a corporation, without actual lawful government authority to do so, but strictly for the benefit of the corporate government and its commerce.  The government shows the capital letter spelling of the Debtor name when they created the “fictitious named” corporation, due to the need of a specific name required for each separate legal entity’s identification.  Therefore, when a corporation is constructed, a name is always given to it, or supposing to be actually given, will attach to it by implication, and by that name alone it must sue and be sued, and do all legal acts, though a very minute variation therein is not material, and the name is capable of being changed (by competent authority) without affecting the identity or capacity of the corporation. 

I am a foreign diplomat, engaged in a diplomatic mission, protected by the International Organizations Immunities Act, and a visiting ambassador of a kingdom foreign to the UNITED STATES INC,  STATE OF LOUISIANA, 16th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT, LOUISIANA DEPTMENT OF WILDLIFE AND FISHERIES, LOUISIANA OFFICE OF MOTOR VEHICLES, and all subdivisions thereof.                         ~ 22 U.S.C. 288-288f-2     and:  ~ Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 15(2) 

 I am a subject-citizen of the Kingdom of Heaven, under its King, Yashua, the Christ.                               ~ Louisiana Secretary of State, Apostille #13,634, and #13,635 recorded April, 18, 2012.

I am not a “US citizen", I never was and I never want to be. I do not consider it a valuable or prized status, and for the record:

I am the Secured Party Creditor, not the DEBTOR or the surety of, and I was defrauded of my proper identity, heritage, and birthright status, and I hereby reclaim it all in full. All agreements and signatures by my hand seeming to agree otherwise are null and void ab initio, nunc pro tunc.            ~ 18 U.S.C. 878

The “Common Law” system upon which our nation was founded has been replaced and or changed by the present “Commercial Law” system, attempting to convert us from being American Sovereigns "over" government, to being slave subjects "under" government.

When a person is forced to use a so-called license, permit or benefit, from the government, they may also reserve their former right (under the Common Law Guarantee of said right), not to be bound by any contract, or commercial agreement, that they did not enter into knowingly, voluntarily, and intentionally. ~UCC 1-207:7

And I do reserve my common law rights when applying for and holding any such licenses.                   ~ UCC 1-308

The “Common Law” system that was guaranteed to us by the Constitution for the united States of America, and for which Americans have fought, bled, and died for has been replaced by a “Commercial Law” system, wherein we have no Constitutional rights, and only government granted privileges.

The Common Law which applies to all living souls is: We are free to do what we please, as long as we do not infringe on the life, liberty, property, or rights of another. It does not allow for any government to prosecute or fine us for victimless crimes. Statute laws have arisen for this purpose, but their power is limited by common sense and by the resolve of those of us who would stand up, claim, exercise, and defend our natural, God given, unalienable rights.

Very few people ask themselves "Which nation was congress working for when it passed this Act or that so-called law?" or, "Does this particular law apply to the Continental citizenry of the Republic of sovereign states, or does this particular law apply Only to residents of the District of Columbia and her other named enclaves, or offshore territories?"

Since I and the largely uninformed citizenry of the Republic do not commonly understand legalese and thus seldom asks these questions, it was and is, an open invitation for our political leadership to seek more corporate power and authority over me and the citizenry of the Republic through the medium of "legal processes" by failing to make a "full disclosure" in corporate contractual matters. Thus, failing to make a full disclosure constitutes "constructive fraud" and renders all such contracts, agreements and signatures seeming to agree otherwise as null and void ab initio, nunc pro tunc.  ~ USA: 27 CFR 72.11

And it is my understanding that America, and all her people enjoy the protection of common-law, and it is my understanding that all flesh and blood, living beings are created equally under one creator, and it is my understanding that we are sharing this existence on Earth together under our Creator.    ~ Genesis 1:26‐28, ( God granted the Dominion over the earth to ALL people, equally, such that every man and woman is a steward of the earth and equal to any agent, officer, judge, Pope or king.)

And it is my understanding that we have been given a conscience to deliberate and make decisions for ourselves and it is my understanding that equality before the law is paramount and mandatory, as:     "No one is above the law". A precept of commercial law founded on both Natural and Moral law binding on everyone, and no one can escape it. Commerce, by the law of nations, ought to be common, and not to be converted into a monopoly and the private gain of the elite few who speak "legalese". ~ Deut. 1:17                                                                                                                                                                                                                          .                                                                                     

And it is my understanding that a statute is defined as a legislative rule of society which has been given the force of law, and it is my understanding that a society is defined as a number of people joined by mutual consent to deliberate, determine and act for a common goal, and it is my understanding that the government of America is a Representative Body and Representation can only come from consent.          ~ Louisiana Secretary of State, Apostille #13,634, and #13,635, recorded April, 18, 2012.

My Intent and Claim of Right:

Therefore be it now known to any and all concerned and effected parties, that I, Marcus Loring: of the Houssaye family, an American native and Freeman-on-the-Land do hereby state clearly, and specifically, and unequivocally, my intent to live in harmony as an American Sovereign, and peacefully, lawfully co-exist in the present de-facto corporate system, free of all corporate statutory obligations, restrictions, permissions, and freely claim, exercise, defend, and maintain in common law jurisdiction, all unalienable rights at law and trade, exchange and barter, which is my birthright. ~ UCC 1-207:7

Whereas; I am a peaceful and responsible human being and it is my understanding that peace officers have been converted into corporate policy enforcers, yet still have an oath to protect the Constitution for the united States of America and serve the people therein. Thus law enforcement officers have a duty to distinguish between corporate statute and true law and as such must decide for their selves to follow corporate orders or obey constitutional oath.
Because the lines have been blurred between what is legal and lawful, law enforcement officers are often as unaware of common law rights as the average citizen, and are being used as the front man to do the dirty work of interfacing with the public for a scam of epic proportions to extract real estate and capital from the ignorance of an innocent, yet uninformed, and mostly law abiding people who have absolute near zero knowledge of American B.A.R. Association legalese, constitutional rights, and lawful due process of law.
It is important to understand that this is not the fault of law enforcement officers. And, I am no better than anyone else, as I was once ignorant of all this too. Being ignorant is a lack of awareness, and it is not through the fault of the people who law enforcement officers are dedicated and sworn to serve and protect, or through a fault of law enforcement officers themselves, but by those who knowingly have committed gross negligence equal to fraud, dereliction of duty, malfeasance and misfeasance of office, and perjury of oath and thus betrayed the public trust their judicial office entails and requires. ~ 18 U.S.C. 241

I claim the right to possess unregistered firearms and ammunition, and to use the same for target practice or for hunting for food, and further swear under oath never to open fire on another human being unless I am in fear of my life and as a last resort to protect from harm, any other human life. I also swear to come to the aid of any fireman, EMT, or peace officer should they request my back up, or assistance and even risk my life to serve them, because they would do the same for me. That is my personal oath. ~ Exodus 20:13

Furthermore, I claim that the intentional blurring of the lines and the failure to define between that which is legal, and that which is lawful in order to extract capital from the masses by legislating freedom and then putting a price tag on it, is a crime on Man, and the failure to define between the living Natural Man and the State created Corporate Fiction is nothing short of a constructive fraud, theft, breach of trust and forced slavery, a heinous criminal activity of the most odious form. ~ Exodus 20:15, 16

I claim that the courts in the United States of America are de-facto and are in fact in the profitable business of creating, conducting, witnessing and executing commercial contracts, and then facilitating the transactions of those security interests with unknowing, and un-consenting parties. I also claim that in order to be lawful, commercial contracts require the knowledge and consent of both parties prior to providing any such services.

 I claim that anyone who interferes with my lawful activities after having been served notice of this claim and who fails to properly dispute or make lawful counterclaim is breaking the law, cannot claim good faith or color of right and such transgressions will be dealt with in a properly convened court de jure. 

Furthermore, because all transactions of security interests require the consent of both parties, I do here by refuse to contract, and deny consent to any transaction of a security interest issuing under any Act or Statute for as stated:
 I am an American Sovereign, a Freeman-on-the-Land, I am not subject to any Act.

"governments are instituted by the consent of the governed."                            
~ Declaration of Independence, July 4, 1776

 Blessings,
 Marcus Loring: de la Houssaye,                                                                                              Ambassador, Louisiana Republic

 

37 minutes ago · Like