Monday, September 24, 2012

Rob Johnson: Statutory Rules CAN Be Laws

As I return from my sabbatical back to the front lines of freedom, retaking the helm of my group, I encourage everyone to do as I have, and to turn a blind eye to the illusions of a free and just system of law that has been pulled over our eyes to deceive us from the truth. That most fundamental truth about the current system as opposed to a truly just system of law, is identifiable in the very name. That system people have been propagandized to believe exists to protect them, is called the CRIMINAL justice system, and every scale from first glance to in depth study will reveal exactly that truth, that the current justice system is without question CRIMINAL. The criminalistic injustice system ensures justice for no one but the highest criminals. The inherently law abiding common man and woman, will never and was never intended to be able to find justice under the lies they have been electromagnetically programmed to believe ARE law. The most crippling attack that our nation has faced has been along the lines of the theft of our own language. This theft is so detrimental because language and words are the basis of what most have been trained to perceive to be law. While this is not absolutely evil in itself to have written law, to apply the utter rigidity of law without the flexibility of the spirit of the law, is itself criminal. Almost as criminal as the deliberate obfuscation of the differentiation between LAW and STATUTORY RULES. Statutory rules CAN be laws, but this is only true in 2 instances. 1. When ACTUAL harm has come to another due to negligence or intent in the claim and exercise of rights. And 2. When an individual SIGNS CONSENT in a registration contract. The first manner which statutory rules can have force of law is the only one that is unavoidable. In the second instance there are other matters that can void the contracts which lead to the terms and conditions of those contracts becoming void. Because most people are deliberately deceived and enter into registration contracts under the perception of a prerequisite mandatory obligation of law, where no such obligation exists, as well as the fact that there is no proper meeting of the minds explaining what rights are being sacrificed in exchange for this limited liability privilege, nor are the limits of that liability ever clearly defined. ALL registration contracts are inherently VOID. The only reason they are able to stand as valid is due to assumptions and presumptions of consent. Because no one ever bothers to send any one any communication withdrawing consent the courts and other government agencies can assume that these contractual terms are valid an binding. Freedom, is a very simple and pure concept, as is TRUE law. Self evident truth is the basis of foundation for ALL law. The self evident truth that explains the supreme common law of this land is not actually the Constitution or even the Declaration of independence, but a paragraph within the Declaration of Independence DOES embody the SPIRIT of the supreme law of the land. "WE HOLD THESE TRUTHS TO BE SELF EVIDENT, THAT ALL MEN ARE CREATED EQUAL, THAT THEY ARE ENDOWED BY THEIR CREATOR WITH CERTAIN UNALEINABLE INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS, THAT AMONG THESE ARE LIFE, LIBERTY, AND THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS - THAT "TO SECURE THESE RIGHTS" (AND FOR THAT PURPOSE ALONE) GOVERNMENTS ARE INSTITUTED AMONGST MEN, DERIVING THEIR JUST POWERS FROM THE **CONSENT** OF THE GOVERNED. It is this concept of the equality of individuals, and self evident natural rights, that is the foundation for the spirit of all that is truly law. MOST of what the majority of people have come to believe the law requires, is not the law at all, and these requirements perceived are but obligations of contractual agreements, and police officers engaged in enforcing ANY matter that does not involve ACTUAL harm to another, or enforcing ANY rule that does not directly protect the lawful rights of others, are simply statutory civil code compliance officers, enforcing the terms and conditions of contracts between the State and the people. In a perfect world this would not be such a bad thing, but this is not a perfect world, it is run by the most corrupt, those who find positions of power are the most detestable sort that should never be allowed near the clutches of political influence. POLITICS itself is not a field intertwined with law naturally, POLITICS are efforts intended to enforce POLICY. There are very few out there today who are interested in upholding and defending THE LAW. What it is most people have come to abide and obey, are the statutory artificial rules o fMEN and WOMEN, they are NOT laws. For this reason MOST people in the country, abiding something other than LAW, are entirely LAWLESS. A grand deception has been under way for the better part of 300 years. A massive experiment where people are trained to ACT like good little slaves at the same time they falsely believe themselves to be free. We are reaching a critical mass with every passing day, where those who come to find the beautiful and simple truths of the law grow and open their minds accepting the naggingly persistent feeling that something is wrong with the illusion most have been hypnotized by. The route to the awakening of most individuals is an intuitive sense that something just isn't right and then a study of the facts to find the truth. My members will come to find not just ample remedy available, but that it is also peaceful and lawful remedy available for anyone to make use of who will simply exercise a little due diligence. After all it is the DUTY of every American to aggressively defend ALL natural fundamental rights.

Rob Johnson on our Duty in a Republic

Sept 23, 2012 Rob Johnson published an article on: DUTY, a word that eludes the majority of the country but that this group has a firm grasp upon. What higher duty charge can there possibly be other than to protect and defend those who either cannot or will not protect and defend themselves? Those of us who are knowledgeable enough and able, have a duty to come to the defense of others when freedom comes under attack. Because the corrupt are cowards, the criminals will rarely ever aim their sights on an individual who is able, willing, and prepared to defend themselves and their freedom. Like any pack predator, the State and it's officers prefer to pick off an evidently weak or injured target. Unfortunately the newest members and most recently learned are likely to be targeted first. This is one reason I implore people to make certain that they are completely well read and understand everything in my work before they even attempt to act. Those of us who are well read have a duty to aide those of us who are not. The spirit of law and freedom are universally intertwined. LAW is a means for individuals to defend themselves without having to resort to force and violence. Civil courts resolve commercial and financial disputes, criminal courts resolve matters of actual harm to others. ALL of these courts are created for the simple purpose of the lawful defense of individual rights. THIS is the ENTIRE scope of authority of the state. POLICE are supposed to enforce only LAW, not the statutory conditions of these contracts people have been manipulated into binding themselves to in ignorance. If police were to enforce only law, and courts were to only entertain cases that can establish standing, the people would be closer to the freedom they were intended to have. DUTY, it is the seed from which all rights flower. EVERYONE has a duty to claim, exercise, and defend rights to ensure that they will exist for future generations, but INDIVIDUALS also have the right to decide which rights they choose to exercise. The people in mass have been intimidated from freely claiming and exercising rights, specificly the right to keep and bear arms. EVERY individual has a right to own a weapon of their choice, gun, sword, crossbow, whatever, and to carry that weapon openly displayed. People have been deceived to believe that they have an obligation of law to subject themselves to complicated testing and cataloging in order to acquire the lawful authority to exersise that right. The truth is that every individual is born with the right to own and carry a gun. And every statute that infringes that right is void without the consent of the individual. No one requires a license or registration to own a gun, no one has an obligation to have a gun with a serial number. Filing off a serial number is NOT a crime. The only reason they have been able to prosecute that charge is because they are doing it as a property violation. Because registered guns BELONG to the STATE, the state can demand as a contractual term that the numbers remain in tact. The simple truth is that simply owning and carrying a gun whether licensed or not, registered or not, is NOT a CRIME. At worst it is a statutory INFRACTION, and that only applies if you are in contract VOLUNTARILY. ALL other matters aside, having a gun on you, regardless of the condition of that gun, in itself is not a crime. If you are not brandishing it or committing a crime with that gun there is no crime being committed. This is not a VALID cause of action. You have a natural right to keep and bear arms. One can no more possess an illegal firearm than they can attend an illegal religious assembly. There is no such thing as an ILLEGAL FIREARM. There is only such thing as a firearm being used in an unlawful manner. Even a department store cannot require you to remove your gun before you enter. People again, have a natural RIGHT to keep and bear arms, this right cannot be infringed by the government, or other people or businesses. ALL businesses MUST respect the rights of the people. Walmart for example can no more lawfully require you to disarm to enter the store than they can require you to not say anything on their premises. The fundamental rights of the people exist everywhere.