Wednesday, December 25, 2019
Tuesday, December 24, 2019
Friday, December 20, 2019
Thursday, December 12, 2019
The Real Stories Behind "American Made" starring Tom Cruise -- part 1
Former LAPD Narcotics Investigator Michael C. Ruppert was forced out of the LAPD in 1977 when he exposed evidence of drug trafficking by the CIA. This is one of his first appearances caught on Video in 1997 at the Granada Forum in Tarzana, CA.
RIP, Michael C. Ruppert ...an American hero.
Thursday, December 5, 2019
Sunday, December 1, 2019
Monday, November 25, 2019
Tuesday, November 19, 2019
Monday, November 18, 2019
GOP rep. weighs in on clemency granted to two Army officers
The US military justice system is a microcosm of the American justice system? Ohhh, this is getting good! Go Trump, get 'em!
Friday, November 15, 2019
Tuesday, November 12, 2019
Sunday, November 10, 2019
Before Governments Will Change Men Must Change.
There are no "citizens on the land" and no one in your county is a "land owner" according to common law. So there are no Common Law courts because there is no one to sit on the jury that can decide fact and law. This is easily explained for a variety of reasons.
To form these Common Law courts and juries you need a common law capacity first among a portion of the people. The problem is tha you cannot get there from where you are at unless you actually make some serious changes in the way you think.
No society has ever come together in a viable way unless the people of that society actually care about their neighbors rights, property and lives as much as they care about their own. They not only have to care about others aw much as themselves they have to regularly and consistently turn that caring into sacrifice and actions based on the noble and loving heart of Christ who came to serve others rather than himself.
- “Before the Norman conquest of England in 1066 the people were the fountainhead of justice. The Anglo-Saxon courts of those days were composed of large numbers of freemen and the law which they administered, was that which had been handed down by oral tradition from generation to generation. In competition with these non professional courts the Norman king, who insisted that he was the fountainhead of justice, set up his own tribunals. The judges who presided over these royal courts were agents or representatives of the king, not of the people; but they were professional lawyers who devoted most of their time and energy to the administration of justice, and the courts over which they presided were so efficient that they gradually all but displaced the popular, nonprofessional courts.” Clark’s Summary of American Law. p 530.
Again, Before governments will change men must change.
If you are not living a righteous life do not pray for justice but for mercy. I you want mercy for yourself you must have mercy for others. Repent, learn to live another way and do not forsake the gathering together in true righteousness.
People do not understand the fabric of a pure Republic nor the Natural Law in which the Constitution was written.
The Real Reason Hillary Clinton is Attacking Tulsi Gabbard
And who was the US senator from NY on 9/11?
The same candidate who ran against JFK Jr. when his brand new twin-engine Cessna 'mysteriously' crashed.
"It's about replacing the corrupt establishment"
~It is about my friend Jesus and not religion.
Isaiah 9:6 For unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son is given: and the government shall be upon his shoulder: and his name shall be called Wonderful, Counsellor, The mighty God, The everlasting Father, The Prince of Peace.
~It is about We the People, and not the party.
"This day shall be remembered as the day the people ruled America again." POTUS DJT 1/20/2017
~It is about America, and not politics.
PROCLAMATION of HOPE to AMERICA On November 8, 2016 WE THE GOOD PEOPLE elected Donald John Trump to proclaim our united States of America as government of the People, by the People and for the People.
So help us Yahshua, it shall not perish from the earth. Trump is the Watchman of our time standing in the gap against the luciferian evil.
So help us Yahshua, it shall not perish from the earth. Trump is the Watchman of our time standing in the gap against the luciferian evil.
~It is about 'We the People' and NOT Donald Trump!
Saturday, November 9, 2019
Friday, November 8, 2019
Wednesday, November 6, 2019
Monday, November 4, 2019
Saturday, November 2, 2019
Sunday, October 27, 2019
Thursday, October 24, 2019
Tuesday, October 22, 2019
Monday, October 21, 2019
Sunday, October 20, 2019
Monday, October 14, 2019
Friday, October 4, 2019
The Drug War ~ The National Voice
The Drug War created by Richard Nixon over 40 years ago is in reality a war against the people of America and our property. Pharmaceutical AND street drugs are the weapons.
http://the-national-voice.com/drug-war/
http://the-national-voice.com/drug-war/
Friday, September 20, 2019
Thursday, September 5, 2019
Sunday, September 1, 2019
Wednesday, August 21, 2019
Thursday, August 8, 2019
Cuban Immigrant Student Deemed "White Supremacist" for Conservative Views
OK, here we go! An immigrant accused of being a "White Supremacist"! Hilarious!
Tuesday, July 30, 2019
Monday, July 15, 2019
Sunday, July 14, 2019
Thursday, July 11, 2019
Sunday, July 7, 2019
Friday, July 5, 2019
Thursday, July 4, 2019
Wednesday, July 3, 2019
Monday, July 1, 2019
Saturday, June 29, 2019
Thursday, June 27, 2019
Wednesday, June 26, 2019
Sunday, June 23, 2019
Sunday, June 16, 2019
Friday, June 14, 2019
Thursday, June 13, 2019
Tuesday, June 11, 2019
Monday, June 10, 2019
Friday, June 7, 2019
Thursday, June 6, 2019
Wednesday, June 5, 2019
Tuesday, May 28, 2019
Friday, May 24, 2019
Thursday, May 23, 2019
Edward Mandell House
Edward Mandell House had this to say in a private meeting
with Woodrow Wilson (President) [1913-1921] –
This is from the
minutes of a meeting in the White house that included President Woodrow Wilson
and his top adviser Colonel Edward Mandell House, before the Federal Reserve
Act or the 16th Amendment (the income tax amendment) were passed and ratified.
(DEC1913)
“Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency.
Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.
They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.
After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor or to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.”
Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”
“Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property in a National system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a chargeback for our fiat paper currency.
Every American will be forced to register or suffer not being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattel, and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, forever to remain economic slaves through taxation, secured by their pledges.
They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two would figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability.
After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debt to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap to us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor or to this fraud which we will call “Social Insurance.”
Without realizing it, every American will insure us for any loss we may incur and in this manner; every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and, we will employ the high office of the President of our dummy corporation to foment this plot against America.”
Tuesday, May 21, 2019
Saturday, May 18, 2019
Thursday, May 16, 2019
The First Trust of the World April 14th, 2019
Unam Sanctam is one of the most frightening documents of herstory and is the one most quoted as the primary document of the popes claiming their global power. It’s an express trust deed. The last line reads: “Furthermore, we declare, we proclaim, we define that it is absolutely necessary for salvation that every human creature be subject to the Roman Pontiff.” It’s not only the first trust deed in herstory but is also the largest trust ever conceived, as it claims the whole planet and everything on it, conveyed in trust.
Triple Crown of Ba’al, aka the Papal Tiara and Triregnum.
Pope Boniface issued in 1302 his infamous Papal Bull Unam Sanctam – the first Express Trust. He claimed control over the whole planet which made him “King of the World”. In celebration, he commissioned a gold-plated headdress in the shape of a pine cone, with an elaborate crown at its base. The pine cone is an ancient symbol of fertility and one traditionally associated with Ba’al as well as the Cult of Cybele. It also represents the pineal gland in the center of our brains, crystalline in nature, which allows us access to Source, hence, the 13-foot tall pine cone in Vatican Square. Think about why the Pontiffs would idolize a pinecone. See: Pharmacratic Inquisition
The 1st Crown of Crown Land.
Pope Boniface VIII was the first leader in history to create the concept of a Trust, but the first Testamentary Trust, through a deed and will creating a Deceased Estate, was created by Pope Nicholas V in 1455, through the Papal Bull Romanus Pontifex. This is only one of three (3) papal bulls to include the line with the incipit “For a perpetual remembrance.” This Bull had the effect of conveying the right of use of the land as Real Property, from the Express Trust Unam Sanctam, to the control of the Pontiff and his successors in perpetuity. Therefore, all land is claimed as “crown land”. This 1st Crown is represented by the 1st Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born. It deprives us of all beneficial entitlements and rights on the land.
The 2nd Crown of the Commonwealth
The second Crown was created in 1481 with the papal bull Aeterni Regis, meaning “Eternal Crown”, by Sixtus IV, being only the 2nd of three papal bulls as deeds of testamentary trusts.
This Papal Bull created the “Crown of Aragon”, later known as the Crown of Spain, and is the highest sovereign and highest steward of all Roman Slaves subject to the rule of the Roman Pontiff. Spain lost the crown in 1604 when it was granted to King James I of England by Pope Paul V after the successful passage of the “Union of Crowns”, or Commonwealth, in 1605 after the false flag operation of the Gunpowder Plot. The Crown was finally lost by England in 1975, when it was returned to Spain and King Carlos I, where it remains to this day. This 2nd Crown is represented by the 2nd cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is born and, by the sale of the birth certificate as a Bond to the private central bank of the nation, depriving us of ownership of our flesh and condemning us to perpetual servitude, as a Roman person, or slave.
The 3rd Crown of the Ecclesiastical See
The third Crown was created in 1537 by Paul III, through the papal bull Convocation, also meant to open the Council of Trent. It is the third and final testamentary deed and will of a testamentary trust, set up for the claiming of all “lost souls”, lost to the See. The Holi See. The Venetians assisted in the creation of the 1st Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540, to use this papal bull as the basis of Ecclesiastical authority of Henry VIII. This Crown was secretly granted to England in the collection and “reaping” of lost souls. The Crown was lost in 1816, due to the deliberate bankruptcy of England, and granted to the Temple Bar which became known as the Crown Bar, or simply the Crown. The Bar Associations have since been responsible for administering the “reaping” of the souls of the lost and damned, including the registration and collection of Baptismal certificates representing the souls collected by the Vatican and stored in its vaults.
This 3rd Crown is represented by the 3rd Cestui Que Vie Trust, created when a child is baptized. It is the parents’ grant of the Baptismal certificate––title to the soul––to the church or Registrar. Thus, without legal title over one’s own soul, we will be denied legal standing and will be treated as things––cargo without souls––upon which the BAR is now legally able to enforce Maritime law.
The Cestui Que Vie Trust
A Cestui Que Vie Trust is a fictional concept. It’s a Temporary Testamentary Trust, first created during the reign of Henry VIII of England through the Cestui Que Vie Act of 1540 and updated by Charles II, through the CQV Act of 1666, wherein an Estate may be effected for the Benefit of a Person presumed lost or abandoned at “sea” and therefore assumed “dead” after seven (7) years. Additional presumptions, by which such a Trust may be formed, were added in later statutes to include bankrupts, minors, incompetents, mortgages, and private companies. The original purpose of a CQV Trust was to form a temporary Estate for the benefit of another because some event, state of affairs, or condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent, and present, before a competent authority. Therefore, any claims, history, statutes, or arguments that deviate in terms of the origin and function of a CQV Trust, as pronounced by these canons, is false and automatically null and void.
A Beneficiary under Estate may be either a Beneficiary or a CQV Trust. When a Beneficiary loses direct benefit of any Property of the higher Estate placed in a CQV Trust on his behalf, he do not “own” the CQV Trust; he is only the beneficiary of what the Trustees of the CQV Trust choose to provide. As all CQV Trusts are created on presumption, based upon original purpose and function, such a Trust cannot be created if these presumptions can be proven not to exist.
Since 1933, when a child is born in a State (Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions specifically designed to deny, forever, the child any rights of Real Property, any Rights to be free, and any Rights to be known as man or woman, rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing their Soul or Spirit.
The Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly and knowingly:
1. convey the beneficial entitlements of the child, as Beneficiary, into the 1st Cestui Que (Vie) Trust in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate Person and denying the child any rights to Real Property; and,
2. claim the baby as chattel to the Estate. The slave baby contract is then created by honoring the ancient tradition of either having the ink impression of the baby’s feet onto the live birth record, or a drop of its blood, as well as tricking the parents to signing the baby away through the deceitful legal meanings on the live birth record which is a promissory note, converted into a slave bond, sold to the private reserve bank of the estate, and then conveyed into a 2nd and separate CQV Trust, per child, owned by the bank. When the promissory note reaches maturity and the bank is unable to “seize” the slave child, a maritime lien is lawfully issued to “salvage” the lost property and is monetized as currency issued in series against the CQV Trust.
3. claim the child’s soul via the Baptismal Certificate. Since 1540 and the creation of the 1st CQV Act, deriving its power from the Papal Bull of Roman Cult leader Pope Paul III, 1540, when a child is baptized and a Baptismal Certificate is issued, the parents have gifted, granted, and conveyed the soul of the baby to a “3rd” CQV Trust owned by Roman Cult, which has held this valuable property in its vaults ever since. Since 1815, this 3rd Crown of the Roman Cult and 3rd CQV Trust representing Ecclesiastical Property has been managed by the BAR as the reconstituted “Galla” responsible, as Grim Reapers, for reaping the souls.
Each Cestui Que Vie Trust, created since 1933, represents one of the 3 Crowns representing the three claims of property of the Roman Cult: Real Property (on Earth), Personal Property (body), and Ecclesiastical Property (soul). Each corresponds exactly to the three forms of law available to the Galla of the BAR Courts: corporate commercial law (judge is the ‘landlord’), maritime and canon law (judge is the banker), and Talmudic law (judge is the priest).
Tuesday, May 14, 2019
Sacred Duty: A Soldier’s Tour at Arlington National Cemetery
A couple of years ago, I vowed to never set foot in New Orleans for the rest of my life. It was after the statue of General Robert E Lee was removed from Lee Circle in New Orleans.
Robert E Lee owned a plantation in Virginia, but never bought, sold, or owned a slave in his life.
And... When he inheirited a large plantation and it came to him with hundreds of slaves he immediately freed the slaves.
https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/sacred-duty-soldiers-tour-arlington-national-cemetery/?utm_campaign=imprimis&utm_source=housefile&utm_medium=email&utm_content=aprirlmay2019sacrerdduty&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--NHWkQibzu-ErIdLOkzPrSE6jMuO4-WGK6I3Vh8D7kFomC0qe17TUEyPRljTMnADO6X9dwp-flZOEICNK8XgrIdX6dTA&_hsmi=72653428
Robert E Lee owned a plantation in Virginia, but never bought, sold, or owned a slave in his life.
And... When he inheirited a large plantation and it came to him with hundreds of slaves he immediately freed the slaves.
https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/sacred-duty-soldiers-tour-arlington-national-cemetery/?utm_campaign=imprimis&utm_source=housefile&utm_medium=email&utm_content=aprirlmay2019sacrerdduty&_hsenc=p2ANqtz--NHWkQibzu-ErIdLOkzPrSE6jMuO4-WGK6I3Vh8D7kFomC0qe17TUEyPRljTMnADO6X9dwp-flZOEICNK8XgrIdX6dTA&_hsmi=72653428
Thursday, May 9, 2019
Monday, May 6, 2019
Monday, April 29, 2019
Sunday, April 28, 2019
Wealth For Freedom (for information purposes only)
editors note: I am re-posting this from: http://wealth4freedom.com/ for information purposes only. Not to be construed as legal advice by editor.
This may be the most important article that you have ever read! It deals with your legal status that determines whether you have unalienable rights or just corporate granted privileges. Most Americans think that they have unalienable rights protected by the Constitution. They also think that when they vote they are in fact electing officials to manage their government under Constitutional principles. Most people think that lawyers and judges practice law under a judicial system. Most people think that the government has no boundary. Well most people have relied upon government controlled schools and the media for their information and they have been misinformed!
Background:
The Declaration of Independence of 1776 is the cornerstone of America. It outlined grievances against the King and proclaimed actions to set the inhabitants free. This was followed by a Constitution for the united States of America. The Colonies/States refused to accept the Constitution without numerated Articles of Rights to be included. This was accomplished in 1791 where Ten specific Articles were included. Now we had a more perfect Union where specified powers were delegated to the Federal Government and the States and the people retained all powers not specifically delegated. The people enjoyed Liberty with unalienable rights, prosperity, and the Common Law. The Constitution was a model for the world to follow. At last people had power over government and were no longer serfs to a King or Dictator. They enjoyed a pure Republic for America.
When we read the Declaration of Independence today, year 2000, we find essentially the same grievances today as the People of the Colonies had in 1776. The inhabitants or citizens have no unalienable Rights, they have no Common Law, they have no law, only ?color of law?, no judicial system, poor education, always entangled in some war, no sound money system, and they are taxed to the hilt. They are serfs on their own property. In fact they do not have a Republic! They now live under a Democracy! What happened that made full circle back to 1776? Is the old saying true; Everything that goes around, comes around? Our problem today is the same as the People of the Colonies had with England in 1776.
The Unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
The Problem:
The problem that caused full circle lies in the original Constitution. It is Article I, Section 8, Clause (17): Powers of Congress:
To exercise exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever, over such district (not exceeding ten miles square) as may, by cession of particular states, and the acceptance of congress, become the seat of government of the United States, and to exercise like authority over all places purchased by the consent of the legislature of the state in which the same shall be, for the erection of forts, magazines, arsenals, dockyards, and other needful buildings; and (18) To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers, and all other powers vested by this Constitution in the government of the United States, or in any department or officer thereof.?
The foregoing exclusive delegated power is the authority to do anything the legislature desires to do within the District (Federal Zone) without Constitutional restraints. The legislature has taken advantage of those delegated powers for their personal and political benefits. In 1861, during the Civil War, Congress adjourned sine die. That term means forever, never to return. The Republic was under Martial Law and President Lincoln appointed representatives for the southern states and forced the legislature to again sit. The 13th Article of Amendment pertaining to Nobility was removed from the Constitution and replaced with a new Article of Amendment that prohibited slavery. That Article was ratified on December 6, 1865. In 1868 the rump legislature incorporated the District as a private municipal corporation. The charter was revised slightly in 1871. Following the incorporation of that government, the legislature adopted the 14th Amendment and promulgated a Civil Rights Act to give privileges to it’s new inferior class of U.S. citizens. The results of these Acts were the end of the Republic and the beginning of the Democracy – and they were Constitutional for the Federal Zone They changed the form of our government. The 14th Amendment made U.S. citizens? out of American Citizens and also made them subject to the legislature. A government of ?we, for, and of the people came to an end. The corporate Democracy has its own Constitution (Constitution of the United States}. The Articles of Amendments from 12 upward are of the Democracy and not the Republic. The Organic Constitution only had 12 Amendments and the Democracy has added many. Now we have two United States with different Constitutions.
Which one do you hold allegiance to?
How you were enticed into the Democracy!
It was the carrot and stick method. The corporation had both and the people were hungry. Mass mind control exercised through the media played its part. The government would take care of its subjects regardless of cost. People never pondered long enough to figure out that governments have nothing but what they can con the people out of. Slogans such as: Take from the rich and give to the poor. What happens when the rich gets poor Can you really be an employer without the resources to pay for labor and materials Not very long! Anyway, the people were going to be looked after in old age. All they had to do was to become a U.S. citizen and thus give up all their unalienable rights, and pay a very small premium for social insurance. Additionally they were agreeing to become a Taxpayer. What a bargain! They became a Taxpayer for any kind of tax, The became a new U.S. citizen? with all those Civil Rights extended by Congress, and they also got the privilege of abiding by any color of law statute, rule, or regulation that might be promulgated throughout their life span. What a deal!! I missed one, they have the privilege to support people in foreign nations as well!
Citizenship- a legal or lawful status
The government never had citizens or subjects before the 14th Amendment was adopted. Thus a new class of inferior citizenship was created. In fact such is a statutory U.S. citizen that is subject to all the rules, regulations and statutes drafted by the corporation under color of law. What was the motive for creating this new class of citizenship? Was it because the Legislature thought they could extend their Jurisdiction into the foreign states, or was it because the Freed men had no legal status after the 13th Amendment was enacted? The Blacks being slaves did not have legal status under the law.
It is interesting to note that the legislature covered their butt with a public law that allowed American Citizens to Bypass the 14th Amendment requirements with an Act concerning the Rights of American Citizens in foreign States. Keep in mind that the exclusive legislative authority granted was limited to the Federal Zone! American Citizens were in foreign states and not under the rule of the legislature. However, by deception they did accomplish their goal. What is wrong with being a corporate citizen? Nothing at all if you understand that you are no longer in the Republic with a Bill of Rights and are subject to all the corporate whims. Federal U.S. citizens have no unalienable rights, just statutory civil rights and government granted privileges, which include, voting, paying taxes, using funny money, welfare, Social Security, licenses, and control of your life. The American Citizen remains within the Republic, has unalienable rights, has common law, he is an elector, and can do anything without a license so long as he does not harm someone else. He possesses all his unalienable Rights. The difference being Liberty and Slavery!
Citizenship is a lawful status. No one can determine your status for you because that is a personal thing. You are what your are, therefore, you must act the part of your status. Others, based on your actions, will determine your status. The term presumption is applicable here. Ex: If you are seen fishing then it is presumed that you are a fisherman. Likewise, if you are seen operating an automobile then you are presumed to be a driver?- and when you enter their inferior court rooms, you are presumed to be a U.S. citizen. What is your allegiance to? Did anyone inform you that you had to give allegiance to the corporation? No, that was your decision. You are a U.S. citizen because you attested to that fact when you signed up for Social Security, voter registration, drivers license, filled out the 1040 tax forms, applied for a gun permit and etc. Thus you have exemplified your lawful status by those actions. You may see that the corporation offers many benefits to its citizens and you cannot get those benefits if you are not one of their members. You cannot straddle the fence and be both at the same time. There is not a court in this Country that would give you standing while straddling the fence. All natural persons born in this Country were born free as American Citizens but their lawful status changed with their first nexus with the corporation, like a birth certificate or something else. U.S. citizens not only have benefits, they have responsibility to pay the national corporate debts that paid for the benefits. By law you have a choice and it is yours to make.
What is the Choice?
If you like being a corporate member of the Democracy, then do nothing and retain your present legal status. In this case you are the slave and the legislature is the master. A growing area of the legal world involves litigation finance.
If you desire to be an American Citizen, under the Republic with all unalienable rights restored and master of your government officers, then you can expatriate from the corporate Democracy. Lawsuit loans are a perfect example of the corporate mentality.
Whereas the right of expatriation is a natural and inherent right of all people, indispensable to the enjoyment of the rights of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, and whereas in the recognition of this principle this government has freely Received emigrants from all nations, and invested them with the right of citizenship; and whereas it is claimed that such American citizens, with their descendants are subject of foreign states, owing allegiance to the governments thereof, and whereas it is necessary to the maintenance of public peace that this claim of foreign allegiance should be promptly and finally disavowed: Therefore,
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, that any declaration, instruction, opinion, order, or decision of any offices of this government which denies, restricts, impairs, or questions the right of expatriation, is hereby declared inconsistent with the fundamental principles of this government.
Sec. 2. And be it further enacted, That all naturalized citizens of the United States, while in foreign states, shall be entitled to, and shall receive from this government, the same protection of persons and property that is accorded to native born citizens in like situations and circumstances. If you are applying for citizenship in the United States, a Las Vegas Immigration Lawyer can be helpful. If you are a Spanish speaker then you can seek out an abogado de inmigracion en las vegas.
Sec.3. And be it further enacted, That whenever it shall be made known to the President that any citizen of the United States has been unjustly deprived of his liberty by or under the authority of any foreign government, it shall be the duty of the President forthwith to demand of that government the reasons for such imprisonment, and if it appears to be wrongful and in violation of the rights of American citizenship, the President shall demand the release of such citizen, and if the release so demanded is unreasonably delayed or refused, it shall be the duty of the President to use such means, not amounting to act of war, as he may think necessary and proper to obtain or effectuate such release, and all the acts and proceedings relative thereto shall be as soon as practicable be communicated by the President to Congress. Approved July 27th, 1968.
Administrative Law and the Power of the Apostille
Administrative Law
I have heard
that your rebellion has been bogged down. What to do next is the plateau that
stops you. This is of interest to me by the fact that I have heard numerous
times; "How so you get them to accept this?" Well the key is if they respond,
then I am sunk. I depend on them not responding. Remember how to cook a frog.
You start with cold water, not hot water!
There seems to be a problem with what may be called "force and effect" of the Law. No matter what subject you approach, you are left with the tyrant turning a deaf ear, or even worse ridiculous statements made to make you appear as though you have the problem. This is a problem that dates back probably 7,000 years.
I may have a solution to this problem that we are now facing. We have been trained to focus our efforts in the big three arenas; Legislative, Executive, and most especially Judicial. The big three are only concerned in keeping their scams moving forward. They look to us for our wealth to be used for their purposes. We must find a process that uses these characteristics, instead of trying to buck their system and get them to admit their evil ways and them believing that they will knowingly correct to those evils.
We have one main weapon in this assault, and that is We the People. The creativity, imagination, American ingenuity, loyalty, truthfulness, and honesty rest with us and not them. It has been programmed out of government a long time ago. But we have been our own worst enemy in redress of our government. We have always depended on the government to do the right thing, and we have reached a time when the right thing is what is best for the government and we do not matter. P.S. look up the definition of communism.
We are not helpless. Government may be sneaky, but it can never be accused of being intelligent. It is always in the self survival mode and must maintain an appearance of invincibility. There are gapping holes in their armor, and that is their law. It must have the appearance of being made for us, while supplying the protection for the ignorant masses of government.
In my opinion, Administrative Law is the best approach. Administrative Law is older and more established than their law (admiralty/maritime on a military footing). Administrative Law is well defined, well settled, and well established throughout the entire World.
Did you know that a rendered Administrative Award is unassailable? The process that I use is expressed at Title 5 United States Code (U.S.C.) Sections 551-559. Specifically at Section 556(d) which states; "... the proponent of a rule or order bears the burden of proof". Well, the IRS is definitely the "proponent" and therefore "bear the burden of proof".
Of course, what happens is the IRS depends on the big three of the UNITED STATES and its subdivisions to protect and defend them. And thus far, this has happened without fail. So they frustrate us by ignoring our writings, documents, evidence, proof, etc. Just because your opponent doesn't answer your questions is no excuse to go crying to the military, maritime, admiralty courts of the UNITED STATES. We have not yet exhausted our Administrative remedies. Instead of crying, hit them over the head with another one of their rules.
Rule 301 of the Federal Rules of Evidence states; "... a presumption imposes on the party against whom it is directed the burden of proof [see Section 556(d)] of going forward with evidence to rebut or meet the presumption." So, if the IRS refuses to participate in your Administrative Hearing, expressed, just answer your own questions, and this will square the "burden of proof" on the backs of the IRS. It is in the interest of the IRS to "come forward" with proof equal or greater than you have shown. But, the IRS can't, can they?
Now, if the IRS refuses to answer your questions, and then refuses to disprove your presumptions, then the IRS (acquiescence, silence) and you (affidavit), by joint agreement, have rendered an Administrative Award in your favor. You now according to their law have the upper hand and must continue to pummel this tyrant into oblivion.
Wait it gets better. Using another of their rules, Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which states, in whole; "When a party whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by these rules and the fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter the party's (IRS) default." Administratively this is called a "Default Judgment on Award".
If we, by expression (affidavit);
1) Ask questions knowing we will receive no answer, we will then be rendered an unassailable Administrative Award, by joint agreement.
2) When answering our own questions, knowing we will be ridiculed and ignored, we have made our presumptions "established fact" of Law
3) We can then go to any of their courts, and force that court to enter our Default Judgments on Award into that court's record. And
4) Upon presentment (invoice), by affidavit, we can also have entered a judgment concerning a sum certain and costs.
We are almost there, but we need to get the approval of We the People. Rule 55 has some disclaimers in it that can give rise to the ugly heads of the big three. We need to make what we have done, Official! Guess what? There is a http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/archtype.htm simple remedy that is available for all that takes your signed document and makes it an Internationally Certified, Authenticated, Official Record and Public document of theUnited
States of America . The procedures for this
is found in International Treaty Law called the Hague Convention (Convention #
12) of 5 October 1961 ,
and again on 15 October
1981 . For you researchers; TIAS 10072; 33 UST 883; 527 UNTS 189.
This treaty was about the "Legalization for Foreign Public
Documents". The way it works, is that you must have the "primary
signature" attested (notarized), then take the attestation (notarization)
to the state official charged with the certification of the attestor (notary).
In most states, this is the Secretary of State who is standing in place of the
Secretary of State of the United
States . The cost for this varies, but most
are between $10 and $25.
Let's go get one more 2 X 4 to hit them over the head. Their Rule 44 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, recognizes this process and labels it as "Authentication of Official Records". The document that we are seeking, and I have never been refused, is called an "Apostille". It is very powerful. It is on all Public Records of all ofAmerica , and
the big three are powerless to stop it, unless they want to defy their master,
the United Nations. This will plug all the holes in Rule 55, and
"they" will be forced to accept. And all that is left is for us to bring
in the most powerful force, that being "We the People".
You may all be wondering if I am an attorney/lawyer, and the answer is no. I am recognized by the federal courts as a Counselor, though. I am an Internationally Certified Public Minister; that's an auditor of government. And I have been using the Administrative procedure for over 30 years and have found it to be almost infallible. With the application of the Apostille, this process becomes very formidable.
It may interest you to know that on7 November 1997 I conducted a verbal Administrative
Hearing with the IRS on the subject of the creation of the IRS. It was audio
taped, a Certified Court Reporter made a transcript, and it was witnessed by
ten of my fellow Americans. The result was that the IRS's only response was
nothing. I have yet to hear from them in any matter. I had not filed a number
of years before the hearing. I have entered this "Default" into the Federal District Court .
I also apostilled this hearing and the Federal District Court has received this
as "authenticated" evidence in their court. I am in the process of
invoicing the court, pursuant to Volume 26 U.S.C. 6551, for restoration,
replevin, and costs for the tyranny and fraud of the IRS.
By the way, our hearing in 1997 determined that the IRS is a Pure Trust of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and has never had the authority to "tax" any man, woman, child, or business within the boundaries of the United States of America, and never will.
There seems to be a problem with what may be called "force and effect" of the Law. No matter what subject you approach, you are left with the tyrant turning a deaf ear, or even worse ridiculous statements made to make you appear as though you have the problem. This is a problem that dates back probably 7,000 years.
I may have a solution to this problem that we are now facing. We have been trained to focus our efforts in the big three arenas; Legislative, Executive, and most especially Judicial. The big three are only concerned in keeping their scams moving forward. They look to us for our wealth to be used for their purposes. We must find a process that uses these characteristics, instead of trying to buck their system and get them to admit their evil ways and them believing that they will knowingly correct to those evils.
We have one main weapon in this assault, and that is We the People. The creativity, imagination, American ingenuity, loyalty, truthfulness, and honesty rest with us and not them. It has been programmed out of government a long time ago. But we have been our own worst enemy in redress of our government. We have always depended on the government to do the right thing, and we have reached a time when the right thing is what is best for the government and we do not matter. P.S. look up the definition of communism.
We are not helpless. Government may be sneaky, but it can never be accused of being intelligent. It is always in the self survival mode and must maintain an appearance of invincibility. There are gapping holes in their armor, and that is their law. It must have the appearance of being made for us, while supplying the protection for the ignorant masses of government.
In my opinion, Administrative Law is the best approach. Administrative Law is older and more established than their law (admiralty/maritime on a military footing). Administrative Law is well defined, well settled, and well established throughout the entire World.
Did you know that a rendered Administrative Award is unassailable? The process that I use is expressed at Title 5 United States Code (U.S.C.) Sections 551-559. Specifically at Section 556(d) which states; "... the proponent of a rule or order bears the burden of proof". Well, the IRS is definitely the "proponent" and therefore "bear the burden of proof".
Of course, what happens is the IRS depends on the big three of the UNITED STATES and its subdivisions to protect and defend them. And thus far, this has happened without fail. So they frustrate us by ignoring our writings, documents, evidence, proof, etc. Just because your opponent doesn't answer your questions is no excuse to go crying to the military, maritime, admiralty courts of the UNITED STATES. We have not yet exhausted our Administrative remedies. Instead of crying, hit them over the head with another one of their rules.
Rule 301 of the Federal Rules of Evidence states; "... a presumption imposes on the party against whom it is directed the burden of proof [see Section 556(d)] of going forward with evidence to rebut or meet the presumption." So, if the IRS refuses to participate in your Administrative Hearing, expressed, just answer your own questions, and this will square the "burden of proof" on the backs of the IRS. It is in the interest of the IRS to "come forward" with proof equal or greater than you have shown. But, the IRS can't, can they?
Now, if the IRS refuses to answer your questions, and then refuses to disprove your presumptions, then the IRS (acquiescence, silence) and you (affidavit), by joint agreement, have rendered an Administrative Award in your favor. You now according to their law have the upper hand and must continue to pummel this tyrant into oblivion.
Wait it gets better. Using another of their rules, Rule 55(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, which states, in whole; "When a party whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend as provided by these rules and the fact is made to appear by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk shall enter the party's (IRS) default." Administratively this is called a "Default Judgment on Award".
If we, by expression (affidavit);
1) Ask questions knowing we will receive no answer, we will then be rendered an unassailable Administrative Award, by joint agreement.
2) When answering our own questions, knowing we will be ridiculed and ignored, we have made our presumptions "established fact" of Law
3) We can then go to any of their courts, and force that court to enter our Default Judgments on Award into that court's record. And
4) Upon presentment (invoice), by affidavit, we can also have entered a judgment concerning a sum certain and costs.
We are almost there, but we need to get the approval of We the People. Rule 55 has some disclaimers in it that can give rise to the ugly heads of the big three. We need to make what we have done, Official! Guess what? There is a http://www.wealth4freedom.com/truth/archtype.htm simple remedy that is available for all that takes your signed document and makes it an Internationally Certified, Authenticated, Official Record and Public document of the
Let's go get one more 2 X 4 to hit them over the head. Their Rule 44 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, recognizes this process and labels it as "Authentication of Official Records". The document that we are seeking, and I have never been refused, is called an "Apostille". It is very powerful. It is on all Public Records of all of
You may all be wondering if I am an attorney/lawyer, and the answer is no. I am recognized by the federal courts as a Counselor, though. I am an Internationally Certified Public Minister; that's an auditor of government. And I have been using the Administrative procedure for over 30 years and have found it to be almost infallible. With the application of the Apostille, this process becomes very formidable.
It may interest you to know that on
By the way, our hearing in 1997 determined that the IRS is a Pure Trust of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico and has never had the authority to "tax" any man, woman, child, or business within the boundaries of the United States of America, and never will.
- Clyde
Saturday, April 27, 2019
Friday, April 26, 2019
Liberty Advocate Framed by FBI? - The Schaeffer Cox Story
Schaeffer Cox, a well known 2nd Amendment lobbyist who had won 38% of the vote in a State House election, became the subject of an intense FBI investigation after he angered State and Federal authorities by openly accusing them of drug trafficking and child prostitution.
Oil pipeline service company executive, Bill Allen, who had been spared prosecution on multiple counts of sexual abuse of minors in exchange for his 2008 testimony against pro-2nd Amendment Alaska Senator Ted Stevens, was among those implicated. “The State Wide Drug Taskforce supplied children for sex to a number of state and federal officials in exchange for those official’s cooperation in concealing the ongoing illicit drug trafficking activities of the State Wide Drug Taskforce,” Schaeffer Cox said.
Not long after these public statements, the same departments that Schaeffer Cox accused of corruption sent in numerous provocateurs to try to switch his efforts off of exposing corruption and on to violent vigilante-type actions. Schaeffer cox, who believes in non-aggression and voluntarism,can be heard on multiple undercover recordings telling the provocateurs, “No, I’m going to pull a Ghandi, NOT a Rambo” and “if we turn violent, people will see us as the bad guys.”
In what some have called a deviation from accepted investigative techniques, the FBI responded to Schaeffer Cox’s rejection of their violent proposals by creating a threat to his children that could serve as a motivator.
Working with the Office of Child Services, the FBI filed a child neglect complaint regarding Schaeffer and his wife Marti’s 1 and 1/2 year old son. Because they do not require probable cause, child neglect complaints are an attractive tool for investigators who wish to enter a home, but lack any evidence to support a warrant.
Once Schaeffer Cox was made aware of the “writ of assistance” issued for the seizure of his young son, the FBI dispatched undercover provocateur, Bill Fulton, to again try to convince Schaeffer Cox to go on a shooting spree in response to these new developments. Bill Fulton, acting under the supervision of FBI Special Agent Sandra Klein, pointed out that the child neglect complaint was obviously the corrupt work of Schaeffer Cox’s political adversaries in the government, and urged him to go kill all officials involved.
When Schaeffer Cox and his friend, Les Zerbe, refused Fulton’s violent suggestions a second time, Fulton flew into a rage, held a hunting knife to Les Zerbe’s throat, and told him he would “slit his throat open and bleed him out at his feet” if he and Cox didn’t agree to the proposed mass shooting. Cox and Zerbe refused, and escaped never to see Fulton again.
Suspecting foul play by the FBI and local police, and fearing for their lives from Fulton, Schaeffer Cox and his wife went to the military police station on Ft. Wainwright for help. Officers there advised Schaeffer Cox that Federal agents had come into the station and bragged of how they planned to “fix the Schaeffer Cox problem” by “going into his home to take out his kid, then just shoot Schaeffer Cox in the process.” The MP’s gave Schaeffer Cox’s attorney affidavits to this effect and would later testify to the same under oath.
At FBI Special Agent Klein’s direction, Fulton made a third attempt to get Schaeffer Cox to do a mass shooting. Fulton did this by issuing a death threat ultimatum and promising to kill Schaeffer Cox himself if he refused the proposal of violence again.
Fearing for their lives, the Cox family packed up and headed for Canada. But the FBI sent another undercover provocateur, RJ Olson, after them, court documents say. Olson, a self described “drug wholesaler” working under the supervision of FBI Special Agent Richard Southerland, held the whole Cox family, including a 2 year old boy and a 3 week old baby girl, hostage, against their will in an attic for 21 days after sabotaging their vehicle, then using death threats from Fulton and a made up story about a truck driver to keep them from leaving.
“The government does not dispute the fact that the actions of the provocateurs working under the FBI’s supervision did in fact meet the legal definition of 1st degree kidnapping,” said Robert John, the Fairbanks attorney who got all related State charges against Cox thrown out.
On March 10th, 2011 Schaeffer Cox was taken from the attic to a deserted industrial lot in Fairbanks where he believed he would meet the “truck driver” Olson had promised. No such truck driver existed. Instead, there was a FBI ambush of out of town agents who did not know Schaeffer Cox was a well respected local political voice with popular support. The Agent’s, who had been instructed to shoot Schaeffer Cox on site if he had a weapon, were not advised by the local FBI case agent of Cox’s repeated statements about being like Ghandi not Rambo.
FBI Special Agent Richard Southerland supplied JR Olson with an unregistered, nontraceable pistol and instructed him to “put it in Schaeffer’s lap then get under the truck so there will be some thick metal between you and him when the shooting starts.” The FBI’s plan was interrupted when the owner of the industrial lot happened upon the scene and started asking questions about why men with masks and machine guns were hiding around the corner.
Schaeffer Cox was arrested and put on trial for “conspiracy against the government.” The prosecution was led by Steve Skrocki and Joseph Botini, the same people that were held in contempt of court for hiding evidence in several related trials of Alaska political personalities. The audio recording of Schaeffer Cox repeatedly rejecting violence were hidden from the jury, but are now being made available to the public by Schaeffer Cox’s supporters via youtube and other means.
Steve Skrocki, who has publically attacked Schaeffer Cox for his belief in Moral Higher Law, built his case primarily on the testimony of Fulton and Olson. But recently released audio recording and email between Steve Skrocki and his boss, US Attorney Karen Loeffler, now show that Skrocki coached his witnesses to lie, then vouched for those lies in his closing arguments to the jury.
Still others have taken issue with Skrocki’s entire theory of the case. “The importance of this case is significant to the whole of humanity,” says Larry Pratt, president of Gun Owners of America. He points out that the prosecution conceded that Cox had no actual plans for violence, but convicted him anyway based on Cox’s belief that ‘We The People’ may someday have to stand down an out of control government.
Schaeffer Cox, who has been in prison since 2011 agrees. “This amounts to sending people to prison for simply believing in the original meaning of the 2nd Amendment,” he says. “If we don’t reverse my conviction, it will set a sweeping new precedent allowing for the wholesale round up of those who have not committed any crimes.”
Rudy Davis
972-839-9848
www.YearofJubile.com
LoneStar1776.com
972-839-9848
www.YearofJubile.com
LoneStar1776.com
---------------------
Editors Note: Thanks to Rich Scheben for bringing this to my attention. This is the kind of citizen journalism that should be done 24/7 to expose the criminals in government who abuse their power and persecute people for their love of freedom and their belief in God, not to mention their belief in their right to defend themselves against tyranny being done to them BY THEIR OWN EMPLOYEES.
LEGAL NOTICE: The Authors specifically invoke the First Amendment rights of freedom of speech and of the press, without prejudice, on this website. The information posted on this website is published for informational purposes only under the rights guaranteed by the First Amendment of the Constitution for the united States of America. Images, text and logic are copyright protected. ALL rights are explicitly reserved without prejudice, and no part of this website may be reproduced unless by written consent. You hereby have written consent to post any individual post from this website containing this copyright to any other blog or email only if you post the whole and unaltered article including this copyright, do not use the article for monetary gain, and give proper credit to the author, and a link back to this blog at http://www.paulstramer.net/. This applies only to articles written or posted by Paul Stramer or Anna Von Reitz. ©2005-2019 by Montana Business Communications (PDS) All rights remain in force. Removing this notice forfeits all rights to recourse. Copyright strictly enforced © The videos are third party and not covered by this legal notice.
Thursday, April 25, 2019
Tuesday, April 23, 2019
Sunday, April 21, 2019
Saturday, April 20, 2019
Thursday, April 18, 2019
Win In Court - Subrogation Update & Express The Trust
http://youarelaw.org - Be advised we cannot answer most questions here but do respond to our private Premium Members, due to the sheer volume of questions. One key to winning a court case as a defendant or someone being sued, is to not play the game. It's really about trusts and establishing you proper position as a beneficial interest title holder - no as much the allegation etc. You are "charged" with a "bill" (indictment is called a true bill, or a suit claims a bill, effectively. So settle it instead). Also know you procedures as taught via http://youarelaw.org/jd
Wednesday, April 17, 2019
Tuesday, April 2, 2019
Monday, April 1, 2019
Sunday, March 31, 2019
Thursday, March 28, 2019
Wednesday, February 20, 2019
Wednesday, January 2, 2019
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)